Dr Manu Saunders FRES

@manusaunders.bsky.social

Ecologist. Mum. Writer. Senior Lecturer Uni New England (Australia). Editor in Chief: Insect Conservation and Diversity. Anaiwan Country. My words. She/her. https://ecologyisnotadirtyword.com https://saundersecologylab.com/

With huge community level implications: workloads increase as journal editors, grant assessors, job panels, lecturers, and research student supervisors have to spend more time assessing human integrity than scientific content. Expectations increase for all as LLM-generated careers are normalised...

Carl T. Bergstrom@carlbergstrom.com · 2w ago

13. Hence our dismal conclusion: rather than finding that LLMs free us to do a better job of what we were doing before they came along, they shift scientific incentives (and the playing field of academic competition) in ways that compel us to do more and more, faster and faster, less and less well.

An insect follow-up to the issues raised by @alexanderlees.bsky.social - a recorder asked ChatGPT to clean up a blurry photo of an insect they didn't recognise. It was then sent in as a record of a cicada. Can anyone work out what the original insect was? (Answer to follow!) bsky.app/profile/alex...

A photo of an insect of some sort, after having been 'cleaned up' by Chat GPT. Original photo to follow!
Alexander Lees@alexanderlees.bsky.social · 2w ago

Great write-up by @pgreenfielduk.bsky.social on our paper in @natecoevo.nature.com www.theguardian.com/environment/... on the impact of generative AI on biological recording #Ornithology #UKBirding 🪶🌍 1/2

I always guide my students to do a quantitative bias assessment in their lit review, because it's the best way to highlight evidence gaps. This should be a standard for all systematic or quantitative literature reviews, not just formal meta-analyses.

Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar@asanchez-tojar.bsky.social · 3w ago

Are our ecological conclusions built on shaky foundations? Our latest paper in @methodsinecoevol.bsky.social highlights that Risk of Bias (RoB) assessment, crucial for ensuring the internal validity of research, is almost never used in #systematicreviews in eco & evo 📉 🔗 doi.org/10.1111/2041...

I got sent 11 expert scientist reactions to Australia's Bureau of Meteorology officially declaring a strong El Nino, and not a single one of the comments mentions fossil fuels, coal, gas, climate policy, power stations, transport, targets - nothing. Of course the media is going to take that lead..