Marty Lederman

@martylederman.bsky.social

Professor at Georgetown University Law Center; former DOJ/OLC attorney

The @nytimes inexplicably continues to assert that "the Justice Department ... gave [Trump] the audit protection as part of a deal to end the lawsuit." Nope. It wasn't included in the "deal." It's a unilateral--and blatantly unlawful--decree by the Acting AG. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/b...

Republicans Let Trump Keep Unparalleled Benefit: I.R.S. Immunity

The rebellion against Todd Blanche’s nomination to be attorney general, now seemingly contained, at no point fundamentally questioned President Trump’s new protections from the I.R.S.

nytimes.com

Dear @politico.com: There is no "IRS audit immunity *deal* applying to the president and his family." There's only a unilateral, unlawful directive of Blanche to the executive branch conferring blanket immunity from investigation and sanctions. www.politico.com/news/2026/08...

Todd Blanche on track for confirmation after Cornyn strikes Trump settlement deal

The Texas senator is a crucial vote on the attorney general nominee in the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is set to vote Tuesday.

politico.com

Senator Cornyn can call it whatever he likes, but Blanche's May 19 directive prohibiting investigations or sanctions against Trump & Family is not an "audit settlement," or a settlement of any kind--it's a blatantly unlawful, unilateral immunity shield. www.texastribune.org/2026/08/03/t...

Cornyn reaches deal to scrap DOJ anti-weaponization fund

Cornyn said he will vote to advance Todd Blanche’s nomination after the acting attorney general formally rescinded the fund and clarified the scope of a tax audit shield for President Trump and his ci...

texastribune.org

The May 19 immunity order is *NOT* a "settlement" or (in Blanche's words) a "mutual release of claims." It is, instead, a *unilateral* grant of immunity to the President and his family from all investigations and liability. It's lawless, and the next AG should rescind it on 01/20/29.

MeidasTouch@meidastouch.com · 3d ago

🚨NEW: Todd Blanche’s new order rescinds the May 18 Anti-Weaponization Fund—but quietly leaves the May 19 IRS immunity settlement intact. Instead of rescinding it, the accompanying memo reaffirms DOJ’s interpretation, arguing the immunity applies only retroactively and only to the parties involved.1/

The scandal w/r/t the Skubal trade isn't that the Dodgers increased their championship odds marginally, but that the Tigers got bubkis in return b/c no other teams were willing to match LA's pathetic offer. (Compare the Nats getting Wood/Abrams/Gore for Soto.) (Disclosure: Lifelong Tigers fan.)

Another interesting (and short) Judge Pitts opinion in one of the gender-affirming-care grand jury subpoena cases. The gist is that DOJ has opportunity to show how the information would be relevant to a (Texas) grand jury investigation, but has offered nada. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Order on Motion to Stay – #108 in Z.A. v. Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford (N.D. Cal., 5:26-cv-04998) – CourtListener.com

Order on Motion to Stay

storage.courtlistener.com

It's precisely *because* of the enormous risks of such outcomes that the Constitution precludes the President from unilaterally taking the U.S. into such a war in the first place. Your daily reminder: Even the Trump Administration itself hasn't defended its legality. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/01/w...

In Iran, the U.S. Appears Headed for a Strategic Defeat, Allies Fear

With none of President Trump’s aims accomplished and the Strait of Hormuz closed, U.S. allies see dysfunction and vulnerability from the war.

nytimes.com

It's a shame that the "I would have been ashamed" line and the perhaps-too-snarky third-to-last graf have consumed so much attention (see Oates, J.C.), because this essay by Emily Watson on Nolan's Odyssey is extraordinarily good and very much worth your time to read. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Emily Wilson · An Uncomplicated Man

As they say at the awards shows, I was humbled to learn that Christopher Nolan has read at least the first line of my...

lrb.co.uk

This is another extremely insightful, very important piece by @sbagen.bsky.social. No one in the legal academy is writing more seriously, rigorously and imaginatively about What Comes Next (and with more candor about the difficulties) than Sam. Please read.

Sam Bagenstos@sbagen.bsky.social · 5d ago

Along similar thematic lines, I have a piece newly up on SSRN about what the Trump Administration might have to teach us about libertarianism, Reichian/Naderite liberalism, and abundance liberalism. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

So did SG Sauer actually dissuade Trump from filing a petition for rehearing in the birthright citizenship case (Barbara)? I believe the deadline just came and went, and there's nothing on the (electronic) docket.

So did SG Sauer actually dissuade Trump from filing a petition for rehearing in the birthright citizenship case (Barbara)? I believe the deadline just came and went, and there's nothing on the (electronic) docket.

Love this thread, and I haven't even seen the film yet! Law-of-war nerd question for those who have (including esp. @emilyrcwilson.bsky.social): Does Nolan question the legality/morality of the Trojan Horse b/c of its perfidious nature?

EMILY WILSON@emilyrcwilson.bsky.social · last wk.

I wrote about the Nolan Odyssey for the LRB. I'll summarize some of my main points below, in case you don't feel like reading all that. www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...