Mathieu Besançon

@matbesancon.bsky.social

Researcher in mathematical optimization at Inria Grenoble, caffeine-fueled computational scientist and open-source developer

Whatever we think of CS conf rankings, they are used by hiring committees, etc. The sub-domain bias is pretty striking on CORE. The few integer optimization conferences are now all rank B I believe. Searching for computer vision gives me a bunch of A* ones.

The blanket requirement of ML conferences on ethics and impact statements, regardless of the contribution, and without any training in ethics, is really just clutter on papers and additional noise, with the same empty paragraphs slapped in all of them.

<academic rant> I am always amazed and annoyed at the same time that there is a research field of "algorithms" in which you need to spend an enormous amount of time to understand if any new method has a slim chance of ever being run

Probably my lazy french brain but some journal allowing delays in paper reviews for "exceptional personal circumstances (e.g. vacation)" gets my teeth grinding hard 😬 Of course with 3 vacation days per year I guess that falls into exceptional

Authors generating pieces of their paper with LLMs: this is saving some research time in the same way throwing garbage out the window is saving home chore time. And yes the comparison is exactly my feeling after the tenth useless adjective and repeated sentence.