Matt Beane

@mattbeane.bsky.social

Studying work involving intelligent machines, especially robots. @MITSloan PhD, @Ucsb Asst Prof, @Stanford and @MIT Digital Fellow, @Tedtalks @Thinkers50

Exciting new hobby project in the offing related to AI and skill. Involves a childhood passion, a wild leap into the unknown, made real via an order from Amazon just now. Will be 100% cool, I will be documenting things, sharing eventually. Feels like April 2023 again!

My hobby horse. You can simulate a rocket all you want, and use more energy on computation than the actual rocket would, but you won't get to orbit until you ignite rocket fuel. What if all the energy we are spending on simulating learning is not the juice we really need to make intelligence?

Independent evaluations of OpenAI’s o3 suggest that it passed math & reasoning benchmarks that were previously considered far out of reach for AI including achieving a score on ARC-AGI that was associated with actually achieving AGI (though the creators of the benchmark don’t think it o3 is AGI)

BildBildBildBild

I propose a workshop. Most engineers/CS working on AI presume away well established, profound brakes on AI diffusion. Most social scientists presume away how AI use could reshape those brakes. Let's gather these groups, examine these brakes 1-by-1, make grounded predictions.

Models like o1 suggest that people won’t generally notice AGI-ish systems that are better than humans at most intellectual tasks, but which are not autonomous or self-directed Most folks don’t regularly have a lot of tasks that bump up against the limits of human intelligence, so won’t see it

Grateful for the opportunity to visit and learn from the professionals at the L&DI conference. And very glad to hear you found my talk so valuable, Garth! Means a lot.

Garth Gilmour@garthgilmour.bsky.social · 2y ago

In Dublin for the National Learning & Development Conference. Some insightful opening remarks, followed by an absolutely stonking keynote by @mattbeane.bsky.social. Crystallised a lot of my worries around preserving expertise in software engineering during the age of GenAI. I have reading to do.

A speaker at the National Learning & Development Conference.

David Meyer (v.) /ˈdeɪvɪd ˈmaɪ.ər/ To attribute complex, intentional design or deeper meaning to simple emergent behaviors of large language models, especially when such behaviors are more likely explained by straightforward technical constraints or training artifacts.

My Thanksgiving post. A Kurt Vonnegut poem. He talks with Joe Heller (Catch 22 fame) about a billionaire. Key part: Joe said, "I've got something he can never have" And I said, "What on earth could that be, Joe?" And Joe said, "The knowledge that I've got enough" www.linkedin.com/pulse/kurt-v...

Kurt Vonnegut, Joe Heller, and How to Think Like a Mensch

This story remains my favorite Thanksgiving message; it reminds me to be grateful for what I have and of the evils of jealousy and destructive competition. I first posted it on my work matters blog mo...

linkedin.com

Not every day your work gets a healthy mention in the Sunday @nytimes.com! The software talent market went into freefall in July of 2022. Sarah Kessler takes us inside the maelstrom by investigating the impact on graduates of coding bootcamps. Great read. www.nytimes.com/2024/11/24/b...

Do Coding Boot Camps Make Sense in an A.I. World?

Coding boot camps once looked like the golden ticket to an economically secure future. But as that promise fades, what should you do? Keep learning, until further notice.

nytimes.com

The action on Eugene's post - and his post to begin with - have instantly convinced me that @bsky.app is beautiful. I am here for it. And will not be bringing my typical technotwitter self here. More nerd/geek/xkcd, more fun/play/good cheer, more aggro sharing of wondrous delights. Woot!

Eugene Vinitsky 🍒@eugenevinitsky.bsky.social · 2y ago

Will trade a sci-fi rec for a sci-fi rec. Folks I’ve loved so far: Lois McMaster Bujold, Ursula Le Guin, Ray Bradbury, Arkady Martine, Becky Chambers

We’re going to hear lots of stories about which people, policies and rhetoric are to blame for the Democrats’ defeat. Some of those stories may even be true! But an underrated factor is that 2024 was an absolutely horrendous year for incumbents around the world 👇 

Bild

2024: the year we give genAI a body 2023 brought us a powerful but intangible general purpose technology. Roboticists have put it to work quickly, and 2024 will make a mockery of 2023. But what does this mean for the world of work? www.wildworldofwork.org/p/2024-the-y...

2024: the year we give genAI a body

2023 brought us a powerful but intangible general purpose technology. Roboticists have put it to work quickly, and 2024 will make a mockery of 2023. But what does this mean for the world of work?

wildworldofwork.org