Matthew Feeney

@matthewfeeney.bsky.social

@re-state.bsky.social research manager "I'm a liberal and I'm against this sort of thing." https://re-state.co.uk/people/matthew-feeney/ Signal: mfeeney.63

💥The Times covering two areas of our research today: 1. Our proposal to fund social care costs through a new social insurance model. 2. Proposals for fiscal devolution ahead of Andy Burnham's speech, and the move towards retained income tax where @alwalker.bsky.social is quoted.

BildBild

Social care - the third rail of British politics Great to see Burnham acting on, rather than just talking about, the social care crisis But there is a real risk that the choices he makes could actually make things worse... 🧵

The Telegraph's Tony Diver reports this morning that the Government are considering our proposal for a mandatory social insurance model to fund care costs, as part of the PM's plans to fast-track the Casey Commission.

Bild

How do you fix Britain? Remake the State. Less than 3 weeks to go until our flagship annual conference, taking place in London on 1 July. Delighted to welcome The Rt Hon Darren Jones MP, The Rt Hon Steve Reed MP, Nick Timothy MP and Danny Kruger MP as keynote speakers.

Bild

🚨 NEW FROM THE DEVO NEXT INITIATIVE 🚨 The Chancellor’s commitment to develop a fiscal devolution roadmap represents a significant opportunity. Re:State's Devo Next Initiative today publishes a set of design principles to realise the full potential of fiscal devolution.

Bild

📢In case you missed it: Last week we published 'Beyond caring', which makes the case for a fairer and more sustainable social care funding model for later life - based on a 'prefunded' system with contributions over the course of working life. re-state.co.uk/publications...

Beyond caring: a new funding model for later-life social care - Re:State

At every point in the system and for many involved, the social care funding model is failing. This crisis is only accelerating in the face of an ageing population and the growing cost of delivering ca...

re-state.co.uk

Seven years ago, ‪@davidjbier.bsky.social‬ and I wrote a paper on CBP drones. We noted that CBP had stated "that it does not deploy [drones] to monitor protests and other activities protected by the First Amendment." www.cato.org/immigration-...

Drones on the Border: Efficacy and Privacy Implications

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s drone program undermines Americans’ privacy and has failed to live up to its expectations.

cato.org

There's quite a lot of unhelpful reporting suggesting that high ranked natsec officials shouldn't use @signal.org because it's compromised. No. Use Signal.* *But if you're a high ranked natsec official maybe don't use your personal phone for work and obey record retention laws.