The defendant successfully proved that part of his punishment was unlawful and thereby acquired the privilege of having the lawful parts reconsidered. The law enjoys finality almost as much as it enjoys discovering exceptions to finality.
When the Court of Appeals tells a trial judge to vacate a conviction and adjust the sentencing document accordingly, does that mean the judge gets to resentence the defendant on all remaining convictions? The Colorado Supreme Court seemed lukewarm on that: www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/09/22/c...