mixedmethodist.bsky.social

@mixedmethodist.bsky.social

Sociologist | Mixed Methods | UKon | R | Inequality Research

While I generally agree with the main point, I do think that AI can be helpful as an (additional) interpretive companion. Often, our aim is not to find something novel but to check the plausibility of our reading of the material against other potential interpretations.

Jess Calarco@jessicacalarco.com · 10mo ago

This thread perfectly explains why AI has little value for qualitative research. Yes, large language models can find patterns in qualitative data. But, they're trained on what we already know. So, they won't find anything surprising. And, surprise is qualitative research's primary value-add.

This thread perfectly explains why AI has little value for qualitative research. Yes, large language models can find patterns in qualitative data. But, they're trained on what we already know. So, they won't find anything surprising. And, surprise is qualitative research's primary value-add.

Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 10mo ago

Absolutely right. AI might be able to summarize (poorly) what we currently know, but a major goal of historical research is to find the hidden surprises out there. Let me illustrate …