Myriam Jessier

@myriam.dopamine.builders

Hey ChatGPT, my pronouns are they/them. Optimizing for search like a sassy old librarian

Machines optimize. People differentiate. Same structure, same order, same concepts as the top result means you are a variant of a thing, not the main show. As quoted in SEO Confidential. Full piece linked in comments.

The Von Restorff effect tells us that people notice what stands out. You can’t differentiate yourself by doing exactly what everyone else is doing, only 2% better. If your goal is to optimize something to the extreme, rely on machines. If you want to create something new, effective, and truly distinctive, rely on people.
Myriam Jessier | Guida GEO
Myriam Jessier, SEO and GEO consultant, on SEO Confidential

Every AI answer opens with a paragraph of throat-clearing and buries the actual instruction at the bottom. That's almost always unusable for an ADHD brain. Installed ayghri's i-have-adhd skill. Ten rules. All of them just good technical writing that helps.

GitHub - ayghri/i-have-adhd: A skill for your coding agent to stop it from burying the answer. ADHD-friendly output.

A skill for your coding agent to stop it from burying the answer. ADHD-friendly output. - ayghri/i-have-adhd

github.com

Reddit huge for LLMs. It's the cleanest record of tribes arguing in their own voice, with their own vocabulary, about what matters to them. r/Watches performing connoisseurship. r/frugalmalefashion litigating value. It feels like ethnography basically but by LLMs and at a dizzying scale.

When you type a query like "healthiest snack for someone in their mid-40s with ADHD.", LLMs break this down to make judgment calls and inferences, such as interpreting "mid-40s" to mean "adult" and inferring that "ADHD" means the user "needs to focus". The fan-out feels like typecasting for products

Do you have good taste? I'm sure you do. Pierre Bourdieu spent his career arguing that taste isn't aesthetic, it's tribal. What you call "good" is a membership card. Then we built a machine that read every taste tribe at once...reflecting our tastes. Taste IS social signaling.

fashion drawings from unsplash

It's Sunday and I have to explain what a bifle is to a Ukrainian friend. So it's this face slap specifically but done with a dick, specifically. Asked my Austrian friend if they have a word for this or if it's just the French. Life is weird.

🦇 Transylvania has great gothic folklore AND Search Evolution Summit 2026. I'll be in Cluj-Napoca, Romania (September 2-4) to talk about how to operate in a messy, complex multimodal search reality. The stage is stacked with practical experts who actually do the work. I'm excited to learn from t

get 10% off with LUNA10 so Luna the gorgeous grey cat on the image doesn't cry

This July, I'm joining Aleyda Solis, Andy Chadwick, and Dan Taylor on Crawling Mondays:The AI Search Roadmap Series! We’re breaking down the tools, workflows, and prompt research needed to track LLM visibility sustainably. 👇 The link to subscribe to the Youtubbe channel is in the comments below.

Crawling Mondays AI search roadmap series starts in July 2026

Asked Claude to find a Mark Williams-Cook LinkedIn post about Dr. Martens. Claude told me I was probably misremembering the brand. - AI I pay for: gaslit me - Search engine: correct and fast - Add "multimodal" to is and a screenshot of the post outranks the post. context + image wins

creenshot of a Claude conversation where the user asks to find a Mark Williams-Cook LinkedIn post about Dr. Martens and multimodal search; Claude reports it could not find the post via web search or LinkedIngoogle getting the answer right and not gaslighting me about it. BildSearch Engine Land article by myriam jessier showing a Mark Williams-Cook LinkedIn post using a Dr. Martens PAA example — 'Can a 40 year old woman wear Dr. Martens?' — to argue that intent should be addressed through multimodal content (product images, About pages, Pride signposting) rather than keyword-driven articles

The 2010s retail crisis had a name: Showrooming. Customers used physical stores to inspect products, then bought cheaper online. The store absorbed the cost of the experience. Amazon collected the conversion. The 2026 version is playing out on your website with generative search.

Bild

Remember how I keep talking about multimodal SEO/GEO and how image optimization is a different story now? That's why. If you trust LLMs to have 20/20 vision when someone uploads a blurry picture of your product (taken in a badly lit store or snatched from a Whatsapp convo)...Godspeed.

Claude saying "attach higher resolution image for better results"

For 30 years, brand equity lived in aesthetics: the color palette, the story, the emotional register. A brand whose value is entirely in the vibe has no calculable residue. So what next? With AI agents, we need to rethink what brand means. Check out my SERanking article in the comments.

no logo naomi klein book cover: big red NO and a white box with a black LOGO in there

CTR assumes someone chose you. Citation frequency measures whether AI systems chose you before the user does. For more, check out my first article with SERanking on why infrastructure is branding now. (link in comment)

Bild

The traditional SEO value exchange is dead. Old deal: Allow crawls ➡️ get traffic. AI reality: 80% of AI crawlers generate zero clicks. AI referral CTR is an abysmal 0.27% (TollBit). You're paying server costs to subsidize LLM training for zero return. What's your brand worth inside an AI answer?

"Graphic stating: 'A large portion of traffic doesn't even hit static pages. It hits endpoints like:'. It displays a grid of six examples: '?add-to-cart=', 'Filtered product pages', 'Search queries', 'Wishlist actions', 'AJAX-powered interactions', and 'Calendar views with query parameters'. The footer text reads: 'These are not cacheable in the same way. They require the server to do actual work every time.

Between November 2025 and February 2026, there was a 32% increase in prompt injection attacks. Research shows up to 84% of these attacks succeed. Not all of them work though. It's a cat and mouse game really. searchengineland.com/hidden-promp...

Hidden prompt injection: The black hat trick AI outgrew

Invisible prompts once tricked AI like old SEO hacks. Here’s how LLMs filter hidden commands and protect against manipulation.

searchengineland.com

Stop treating AI bots equally. 🤖 Training crawlers: Ingest for free (infra cost, 0 return). 🔍 Retrieval agents: Index real-time (drives citations). Restrict training bots on heavy paths, keep retrieval open, and edge-block unverified scrapers. Bot personas dictate AI visibility.

'What the right response looks like in different situations.' It details a three-step framework for managing bot traffic, currently highlighting advice for beginners who are 'just getting started'.

1/ Google published a "marketing guide" that opens with: "AI is the best thing that has ever happened to Google Search." A sentence written by Google. About Google. In a Google document. Thread. 🧵

AhrefsBot made 390,000 requests to a single site's add-to-cart URLs in 24 hours. This made me go "wut?". I got an early preview of Kinsta's bot traffic study, and it was an uncomfortable read (highly recommend it if you are a technical SEO).

A horizontal bar chart titled '7.67 million requests hit add-to-cart URLs in 24 hours.' The chart shows bot traffic proportions: Claudebot at 48.9% (3.75M), Blexbot at 24% (1.84M), GPTBot at 12.8% (0.98M), Googlebot at 9.3% (0.71M), and Ahrefsbot at 5.1% (0.39M). Subtext explains that even Google's unblockable crawler was caught in this 'add-to-cart trap.' A footer note highlights that Claudebot's volume equates to one request every 23 milliseconds, none of which are cacheable.

Pro tip for Claude: it has a NotebookLM setting. You can turn web search OFF but keep Research ON. This forces Claude to run its deep investigation only inside your connected internal tools (like Google Drive, Gmail, or Slack).