🎉🎉 Excited to have two papers accepted to #ACL2025! Our first paper designs a preference training method to boost LLM personalization 🎨 While the second outlines our position on why MCQA evals are terrible and how to make them better 🙏 Grateful for amazing collaborators!
Nishant Balepur
@nbalepur.bsky.social
CS PhD Student. Trying to find that dog in me at UMD. Babysitting (aligning) + Bullying (evaluating) LLMs nbalepur.github.io
Want to know what training data has been memorized by models like GPT-4? We propose information-guided probes, a method to uncover memorization evidence in *completely black-box* models, without requiring access to 🙅♀️ Model weights 🙅♀️ Training data 🙅♀️ Token probabilities 🧵 (1/5)
Information-Guided Identification of Training Data Imprint in (Proprietary) Large Language Models
High-quality training data has proven crucial for developing performant large language models (LLMs). However, commercial LLM providers disclose few, if any, details about the data used for training. ...
arxiv.org
Finally may have figured out why LLMs rhyme so compulsively: instruction-tuning. Training an LLM to respond "helpfully" to user queries may push models into more "pleasing" aesthetic forms.
Had a great time presenting my research on building more helpful QA systems @imperialcollegeldn.bsky.social! Thank you @joestacey.bsky.social for letting me invite myself 🫶 And loved visiting London+Edinburgh this week, hope to be back soon! 🙏
🚨 Our team at UMD is looking for participants to study how #LLM agent plans can help you answer complex questions 💰 $1 per question 🏆 Top-3 fastest + most accurate win $50 ⏳ Questions take ~3 min => $20/hr+ Click here to sign up (please join, reposts appreciated 🙏): preferences.umiacs.umd.edu
🚨 New Position Paper 🚨 Multiple choice evals for LLMs are simple and popular, but we know they are awful 😬 We complain they're full of errors, saturated, and test nothing meaningful, so why do we still use them? 🫠 Here's why MCQA evals are broken, and how to fix them 🧵
⚠️Current methods for generating instruction-following data fall short for long-range reasoning tasks like narrative claim verification. We present CLIPPER ✂️, a compression-based pipeline that produces grounded instructions for ~$0.5 each, 34x cheaper than human annotations.
🚨 New Position Paper 🚨 Multiple choice evals for LLMs are simple and popular, but we know they are awful 😬 We complain they're full of errors, saturated, and test nothing meaningful, so why do we still use them? 🫠 Here's why MCQA evals are broken, and how to fix them 🧵
Excited to share 2 papers at #NAACL2025 main! 📄✍️ MoDS: Multi-Doc Summarization for Debatable Queries (Adobe intern work, coming soon!) 🤔❓Reverse QA: LLMs struggle with the simple task of giving questions for answers Grateful for all my collaborators 😁
People often claim they know when ChatGPT wrote something, but are they as accurate as they think? Turns out that while general population is unreliable, those who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks can spot even "humanized" AI-generated text with near-perfect accuracy 🎯
Manifesting some good luck for my experiment running tonight 🤞 Best of luck to anyone submitting tmrw :)
Exciting research on an AI-driven mnemonic generator for easier vocabulary memorization by @nbalepur.bsky.social, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Rachel Rudinger, & @alexanderhoyle.bsky.social. Part of 21 CLIP projects at #EMNLP2024. 👉 Read more: go.umd.edu/1u48 #AI
OLMo 2 is out 🥳 7B and 13B trained on 5T tokens, and meticulousy instruction tuned using Tulu 3 recipe. Simply the best fully open models yet. Really proud of the work & the amazing team at @ai2.bsky.social