J.B. Negrón

@negronjb.bsky.social

#publichealth, #healthpsychology, and #socialsciences i apply #qualitativeresearch methodology and methods to better understand human behavior and HOW things work rethinking sexuality in rheumatic diseases www.reumasutra.com PUR/BCN

“Positivism Creep” “The subtle, often unacknowledged infiltration of positivist or post-positivist assumptions into methodologies where they do not naturally, philosophically, practically, or epistemologically belong.” By @thomasgraves.bsky.social @maddipow.bsky.social @annayahprosser.bsky.social

Many developments to reform the research landscape have occurred over the past decade. These changes have been made with broad goals to improve the ‘openness’ of research and often assumed to be ‘methodologically -agnostic’; that is, they ostensibly have benefits for all researchers occupying all epistemological and methodological positions. ‘Open science’ initiatives such as study pre-registration (i.e., specifying research aims and analytical plan ahead of data access), open data sharing, open-access publication,  and open materials sharing are becoming increasingly mainstream across many fields within social research and the natural sciences. While there has been much criticism of these interventions, largely from the qualitative research community, we want to draw attention to a troubling trend in the promotion of open science: the leaking of standards relevant only to quantitative research to all paradigms. Or, as others refer to it, “positivism creep”. Here, we situate positivism creep (i.e., the creeping of positivist conventions to all research) within research policy, we highlight its increasing prevalence within open science reforms, and we warn against a future which could alienate many non-positivist scholars. We argue that the primary framing of open science as the pursuit of reproducibility and objectivity risks promoting positivism creep in the social sciences and humanities. In particular, we suggest that overly strict open research requirements placed by funders may reduce the range and variety of epistemological positions that can be taken by researchers, with particularly deleterious effects for qualitative researchers.
Dr Madeleine Pownall@maddipow.bsky.social · 9mo ago

New preprint with Thomas Graves and @annayahprosser.bsky.social: "Getting Creeped Out? Open Science, Qualitative Methods, and the Dangers of Positivism Creep". osf.io/preprints/so...

I have a lifelong inflammatory condition, and used to research lifelong inflammatory conditions. It's been 10 years, and I still find ways my reflexivity shapes my knowledge of literature and how I engage with it. 1/2

The real problem isn’t the student; it’s the University of Oklahoma. If they don’t know how to handle this, it shows a lack of character and leadership in higher education, which is not what you would expect from people in those positions. Both, the essay and the way it was handled are a flunk.

At least for today, we need to understand three things: 1) Acetaminophen does not cause autism. 2) The State of Israel ≠ Jews ≠ people who live in Israel. 3) Hamas ≠ Palestinians.

"As members of institutions committed to health equity, we write with moral urgency in response to the devastation inflicted on civilians in Gaza since October, 2023.1 We cannot remain silent in the face of the unfolding genocide carried out by the Israeli Government."

Gaza and the collapse of public health: a call for action

As members of institutions committed to health equity, we write with moral urgency in response to the devastation inflicted on civilians in Gaza since October, 2023.1 We cannot remain silent in the fa...

thelancet.com

Acá les comparto este texto que publicamos Times Higher Education sobre colaboraciones entre universidades y organizaciones sin fines de lucro: www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/keys-... En el texto hablamos de nuestra experiencia con el curso de Salud Global del Tecnológico de Monterrey.

The keys to strong university–non-profit partnerships

Collaborative projects between universities and non-profits nurture empathy and allow students to make a real-world impact. Here, three educators share their tips for building meaningful partnerships ...

timeshighereducation.com

A great talk by @ginnybraun.bsky.social on GenAI and qualitative analysis. Can GenAI do reflexive TA? The short answer is no - reflexive TA is a human practice. Should we use GenAI as qualitative researchers given all the harms of the tech? If you're remotely concerned with social justice ... no???

Prof. Virginia Braun (she/her they/them)@ginnybraun.bsky.social · last yr.

Here's a talk I gave as a keynote for the BPS @qmip.bsky.social conference (July 2025) - the result of @vicclarke.bsky.social & I recognising we needed to "dive in" & grapple with the beast that is GenAI & qualitative/(reflexive) thematic analysis www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zFQ...

Uncharacteristcally long 🧵 (sorry) re: #Qualitative methodologies, science, and 'AI'. As Qualitative researchers, we should definitely care and remain curious about what 'good work' can look like - but we should be very wary about assuming that a focus on 'rigour' will address this question. 1/13

A growing body of research demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion with pills, coupled with the global pandemic in 2020 and the fall of Roe in 2022, has many U.S. doctors changing their views.

Three years after Roe fell, more women are managing their abortions without doctors

A growing body of research demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion with pills, coupled with the global pandemic in 2020 and the fall of Roe in 2022, has many U.S. doctors changing their views.

n.pr