Niklas Elmqvist

@nelmqvist.bsky.social

Villum Investigator and Professor in HCI & visualization at Aarhus University in Denmark. Husband, dad, dog dad, runner, Kung Fu artist, gamer. He/him. Mastodon: @elm@vis.social

Friendly PSA to reviewers: Not every country in the world has the concept of an IRB, and not every university requires an ethics review for straightforward HCI experiments. Dinging a paper because it does not have a statement about IRB review is inappropriate.

Random Friday night thought: the way we prompt LLMs to give the illusion of a conversation by feeding it the entire chat history every time is essentially the plot of the movie The Notebook (2004; Ryan Gosling, Rachel McAdams; originally a book by Nicholas Sparks). 🤔

Help us figure out the impact of Generative AI in the visualization community! Is the same old, an existential threat to the field, or just another nifty tool in a long line of tools? We need your input whether you’re an academic or practitioner alike. Do you love it? Do you hate it? Let us know!

Gabriela Molina León@gabymlp.bsky.social · 6mo ago

📊 Everyone is debating the use (or not) of #GenAI, and the #dataviz community is no exception. My colleagues and I are conducting a survey to understand this moment, and we'd love to hear your thoughts on how this is impacting our field (please share!): survey.au.dk/LinkCollecto...

Friendly PSA: If you are an associate editor for a journal and you decide to make a decision on a paper you have enlisted me to review *before* my review deadline, please think again. I know how hard it is to find reviewers, but you really aren't helping matters by wasting my time.

The big LLMs are now promising ‘Ph.D.-level’ performance. If you are an academic and using them in lieu of your own writing, thinking, and reviewing, you are implicitly agreeing with this claim. Sure, you can use LLMs to augment your own abilities, but make sure you are not supplanting them.

Mental note: the month of November is basically entirely spent on CHI revisions (if you have the fortune of having them). #chi2026 (This may sound bitter, but it really isn’t. It’s just a dispassionate observation that a CHI project is now basically a full-year enterprise.)

It is frankly ridiculous how much time is spent manually marking up LaTeX to show how a paper was revised in the CHI R&R process. Sure, some of this is about clear communication with reviewers. On the other hand, we know how to create automatic diffs of PDFs: why not just use this? #chi2026

VIS 2025 wrapped! Our OPC team introduced two experiments: student reviewers (20% uptake, successful mentorship model) and public peer reviews (16 papers, 52 reviews on OSF). Both continue next year. Thanks to our IPC and the incredible Petra Specht. #ieeevis 🎢 ieeevis.org/year/2025/bl...

Road's End - Reflections on the VIS 2025 Review Process

IEEE VIS 2025 in Vienna has come to a close and we—Niklas Elmqvist, Holger Theisel, and Melanie Tory, the 2025 Overall Papers Chairs (OPCs)—have reached the ...

ieeevis.org

Here we have Johannes Ellemose giving his #ieeevis 2025 talk on “Eye of the Beholder 🧿: Towards Measuring Visualization Complexity”. Is there something intrinsic about a visualization that can be used to characterize its complexity? Johannes connected several studies to investigate this.

Johannes at the podium getting ready to give his talk with a title slide showing “Eye of the Beholder: Towards Measuring Visualization Complexity” and the authors: Johannes Ellemose and Niklas Elmqvist.