Nicole Gugliucci

@noisyastronomer.com

Physics professor, astronomer, education researcher, and scicommer who loves dogs, speculative fiction, weights, and good trouble. NH, US. She/They. Opinions are mine alone. RT≠endorsement. Posts are ephemeral. I swear a lot. noisyastronomer.com

Please keep my doggo in your thoughts as she spends the night at the vet hospital. She's a tough bitch, but being 16 is rough. So glad we got to cuddle her after driving 6 hours to get back to her.

Me, cuddling my white faced doggo on the floor of the vet clinic

Yesterday I had a wide-ranging discussion about a bunch of things with my spouse and the subject of the imaginary number "i" came up... Him: They just made up a new number. Me: Well, it expands the number system so that numbers are two-dimensional. Him: No. Me: What? Him: Nope. 😂

I recognize that this is true, and I deeply appreciate the science communicators inhabiting these spaces. I, however, am not in these spaces... So, do me a favor? Drop a link to your favorite short-form video science communicators! (Maybe it's even you?) Let's share the good content! #SciComm 🧪

Matthew Facciani@matthewfacciani.bsky.social · 2mo ago

To remain relevant and combat false information, scientists and publishers must engage audiences where they increasingly consume information: social-first, video-driven platforms. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

I only have access to the first bit, but Ab. So. Lute. Ly. on the main point. I've seen this for years in assessments of the science outreach that I love so much. As I retreated to the higher ed classroom, w/ a slightly different population (at least politically mixed) I've had to reckon with that.

Elise Cutts@elisecutts.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Newsletter up. Rant incoming. Pop sci mostly reaches educated, left-leaning, wealthy readers — including, of course, scientists and science writers. I increasingly believe the gap between the real general audience and what's called "general audience" in scicomm is huge and worth talking about: 🧪

This is an absolutely spectacular essay that EVERYONE who cares about the professional field of astronomy and astrophysics needs to read. "...doing astrophysics is a satisfying and meaningful human activity... people are always the ends, not merely the means." 🔭🧪🎢 #AcademicSky (🛢️ coming later)

Astrobites@astrobites.bsky.social · 4mo ago

From @qwasistellar.bsky.social: Artemis, AI, Astronomy, and our place in it. The author asks why do astrophysics at all. To produce results faster, or to turn graduate students into inefficient stand-ins for software? ⚛️ 🔭 ☄️ 🧪 astrobites.org/2026/04/10/tell-me-why-a-case-for-humane-astrophysics/

A fantastic instructional designer I know sent along what looks to be a useful tools for evaluating how susceptible your assignments are to AI. I haven't tried it yet, but it DID lead me to the creator's substack "Slow AI" which I am already loving (1/2) Ex: theslowai.substack.com/p/the-people...

The People Deciding AI Can Do Your Job Have Never Done Your Job

60% of organisations have cut jobs in anticipation of AI. 2% have evidence it works.

theslowai.substack.com

SO GLAD YOU ASKED!!! 🔭📡 The far side is going to be super radio quiet (little human-made interference). Also, the Earth's ionosphere blocks frequencies below a certain limit, and studying the universe at those frequencies can tell us a lot about cosmology cosmicdawn.astro.ucla.edu/lunar_telesc...

Lunar Telescopes - Cosmic Dark to Cosmic Dawn

The site is intended as a free educational resource about the frontiers of galaxy formation.

cosmicdawn.astro.ucla.edu

Greg Smith@notthatgreg.bsky.social · 4mo ago

What kind of cool things could you do with an array on the Moon?