Nubanuba Omoharu

@nuba77.bsky.social

She/Her 🏳️‍🌈⚧️ || Artista y Escritora || Pokemon & Mili ❤️ || Lots of RT woops || piksi cásate conmigo

In animation I've seen plenty of people assume their dept. is the hardest/most vital. As someone who's worked from vis dev to final stringout I can tell you: it's all vital. It's all skilled work. An engine is an important car part, but it still won't run without wheels. Be a team, not a tier list.

Ben Hart@pavlovforgoths.com · 9mo ago

the discourse on what jobs are acceptable to replace with generative AI reveals a lot about what we think of other people's jobs

recently my friend's comics professor told her that it's acceptable to use gen AI for script-writing but not for art, since a machine can't generate meaningful artistic work. meanwhile, my sister's screenwriting professor said that they can use gen AI for concept art and visualization, but that it won't be able to generate a script that's any good. and at my job, it seems like each department says that AI can be useful in every field except the one that they know best.

It's only ever the jobs we're unfamiliar with that we assume can be replaced with automation. The more attuned we are with certain processes, crafts, and occupations, the more we realize that gen AI will never be able to provide a suitable replacement. The case for its existence lies on our ignorance of the work and skill required to do everything we don't.

By magicmosshka, yesterday's

Saw some post where some guy condescendingly insisted that anybody who still uses twitter is basically like attending a nazi bar and that they're okay with fascists. Hey y'all, maybe some people just like using a social media platform that has more features and isn't US-centric, it's not that deep.