Lisa L. Ouellette

@patentscholar.bsky.social

Prof at @StanfordLaw.bsky.social, Senior Fellow at @SIEPR.bsky.social, physics PhD. Researching IP & innovation. Coauthor of free patent casebook: patentcasebook.org

To add to all the @ssrn.bsky.social complaints: For the 2 forthcoming articles I posted in May, SSRN deleted publication info until I contacted support. For the agency comment I posted this week, SSRN added fake publication info—and their new chatbot wasn't exactly helpful in resolving the problem 🙄

Screenshot of an SSRN support chatbot conversation with “Eva,” Elsevier’s virtual assistant. The user explains that SSRN abstract ID 7083538 incorrectly lists “Stanford Law Review, Forthcoming,” even after the user removed the publication information. Eva first asks the user to rephrase, then gives an irrelevant answer instructing the user to email an updated PDF to The Lancet at preprints@lancet.com.Continuation of the SSRN chatbot conversation. After the user marks Eva’s answer as unhelpful, Eva says no agents are available and directs the user to submit details through a form. After the form is completed, Eva reports that it cannot create a support ticket because of a technical issue and asks the user to return during opening hours.

Patent folks: Is there no longer a way to search USPTO file wrappers without a login? My casebook exercise previously directed students to Patent Center, but that started requiring an account in fall 2025, so I switched to the Open Data Portal, but now that needs a login too?!

Screenshot of USPTO Open Data Portal showing that "starting on June 18, 2026, you'll need to sign in with a valid USPTO.gov account"

This looks fantastic! I don't qualify to submit, not being faculty, but I can provide a professional sounding board given my software engineering background re: computational law/AI/cryptography/blockchain. I can't tell you how many legal papers I've read where some of the tech details are wrong.

Lisa L. Ouellette@patentscholar.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Know a junior scholar who would benefit from the Junior Faculty Forum on Law and STEM at @law.stanford.edu this fall (cosponsored with @penncareylaw.bsky.social and Northwestern Law)? Please encourage them to submit by June 15! conferences.law.stanford.edu/stanford_jff...

Tomorrow (4/29) is the first Supreme Court patent argument in 3 years! Wondering what it's all about?

Lisa L. Ouellette@patentscholar.bsky.social · 4mo ago

@law.stanford.edu student Kaidi (KD) Zhang has a great preview of the Supreme Court’s 4/29 Hikma v. Amarin argument on patent inducement for generic “skinny labels”—including why neither side’s standard solves the underlying innovation policy problem writtendescription.blogspot.com/2026/04/hikm...

@law.stanford.edu student Kaidi (KD) Zhang has a great preview of the Supreme Court’s 4/29 Hikma v. Amarin argument on patent inducement for generic “skinny labels”—including why neither side’s standard solves the underlying innovation policy problem writtendescription.blogspot.com/2026/04/hikm...

<i>Hikma v. Amarin</i> Argument Preview

Lisa Larrimore Ouellette's Patent & IP Blog, Reviewing Recent Scholarship on Patent Law, IP Theory, and Innovation

writtendescription.blogspot.com

J

Thank you for your work! As you say in your article, "Data transparency should become the norm rather than the exception." I empathize with your experience about having difficulty replicating results and then finding coding errors! Scholarly consensus must start with readily available data!