Patrick Brian Smith

@patrickbriansmith.bsky.social

Assistant Professor and University Fellow at the University of Salford // media, forensics, human rights, law + doc/spatial/political theory // https://salford-repository.worktribe.com/person/2316413/patrick-brian-smith

Presenting at #CSA2026. Drawing on Israel's Project Nimbus, the paper examines how cloud computing and AI are becoming increasingly embedded in contemporary architectures of warfare, and what this reveals about the evolving relationship between Big Tech, militarisation, and imperial power.

BildBild

Upcoming talk with Erik Reichborn-Kjennerud (Senior Research Fellow at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs) on his new book "The World According to Military Targeting" (MIT Press, 2025). Register here: www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/the-world-...

The World According to Military Targeting, talk w/ Erik Reichborn-Kjennerud

Erik Reichborn-Kjennerud talk and discussion on his new book The World According to Military Targeting

eventbrite.co.uk

New article co-authored with Patrick Brodie for this excellent issue of the Spanish language journal Ecología Política, focused on the theme of "militarisation." Our article is titled "Big Tech, AI, and the Political Ecology of Digital Militarisation" www.ecologiapolitica.info/en-profundid...

Big tech, inteligencia artificial y ecología política de militarización digital - Ecología Política

Big tech, inteligencia artificial y ecología política de militarización digital | En Profundidad | 70 Militarización | Ecología Política

ecologiapolitica.info

🔴 Nigel Farage’s Reform is more reliant on super-rich backers than any major party in modern British political history 75% of *all* Reform donations *ever* have come from just three rich men Is this what democracy looks like? New on Democracy for Sale democracyforsale.substack.com/p/75-of-refo...

75% of Reform UK’s donations have come from just three rich men

Calls grow for donation caps as Democracy for Sale research reveals that three-quarters of Reform’s funding comes from a trio of wealthy donors

democracyforsale.substack.com

"The US was born in war and has waged a war of some sort in every year of its existence. Silicon Valley knows that war is good for business. And many of its most powerful people want us to stop worrying about frivolities like ethics or ecology and love the bomb" www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...

Laleh Khalili · Collective Property, Private Control: Defence Tech

The United States was born in war and has waged a war of some sort in every year of its existence. Silicon Valley knows...

lrb.co.uk

Interesting new piece challenging some of the assumptions on OSI contributions to atrocity accountability, particularly relating to the privileging of legal deference: there is a growing risk of excluding accounts of suffering in order to appease legal practices and norms - tinyurl.com/yc4v6y9z

Law’s capture of human rights focused open-source investigation

Abstract. With new protocols emerging to regulate the field of open-source investigation, this article critiques their widespread deference to the requirem

tinyurl.com

"We were excited to have a panel accepted on the role of technology in genocide in Gaza at this year’s Computers, Privacy & Data Protection (CPDP) conference in Brussels. However, CPDP then requested that Access Now & others remove the word “genocide” from panel titles & descriptions. We declined."

Two accepted panels on Palestine were targeted after the preliminary programme was published online: Technologies at war: The role of tech companies and the EU in facilitating war crimes and genocide in Gaza, and Cyber Surveillance and Data Violence in Palestine: Protection, Practice, and Legality. CPDP approached the panel organisers and advised them to remove the word ‘genocide’ in the titles and descriptions, including references to crimes and violations of international law. 

CPDP then unjustifiably singled out these two panels with a disclaimer that read: “The text of this panel represents the opinions of the Panel Organiser and not those of CPDP. The case before the ICJ regarding the categorization of Israel’s activities in Gaza has yet to be decided.” Upon the request of the panels’ organisers, the disclaimer was removed. 

Discussions about human rights abuses, atrocity crimes, or genocide do not require a court ruling to be legitimate. At the core of international law and human rights work is prevention — a responsibility that also extends to private companies, which are expected to identify and mitigate risks of contributing to such abuses. These obligations are clear under the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The  International Court of Justice (ICJ), in its provisionary measures orders, affirmed the responsibility of state and non-state actors to take actions in the face of a clear and imminent risk of genocide.  Multiple UN bodies and experts, genocide scholars, and leading human rights organisations have already categorised the Israeli conduct in Gaza as genocide that has met all legal elements of this crime.