Paul Keller

@paul.eurosky.social

Director of Policy at Open Future, President of the COMMUNIA association for the Public Domain. Advocate for more open, just & inclusive digital policies in 🇪🇺 & beyond. Collector of collateral knowledge, © nerd, cyclist.

One last thing before I log off for the summer break: my analysis of all 432 responses to the EU consultation on AI and copyright. Nearly every submission asks the Commission to deliver one half of its dual objective at the expense of the other. A small group shows how the circle could be squared.

Line chart showing positions on the Article 4 TDM exception by stakeholder group. Rightsholders peak at "harden" (95) and "exclude GenAI" (71); tech industry and libraries peak much lower at "keep as is" and "clarify".

New from 404 Media: a company is selling tons of old books specifically to AI companies and says they have a strong NDA to never reveal which AI company bought all of the books. They don't want headlines of 'we scanned and destroyed millions of books for AI' www.404media.co/ai-companies...

AI Companies Are Buying Tons of Old Books Because They're Free of AI Slop

ISBNdb, a company that sources printed books for AI companies to turn into training data, tells clients “the optics problem is real.”

404media.co

Who pays for the commons? Generative AI was built on the open web, but little value has flowed back. @paul.eurosky.social’s latest at @botpopuli.bsky.social argues copyright can't fix this on its own — and makes the case for a levy on commercial AI deployment. Read it: botpopuli.net/who-pays-for...

Who Pays for the Commons?

Three and a half years after the emergence of generative AI as a new technology paradigm, there is broad agreement that AI companies have extracted enorm...

botpopuli.net

The Dutch GPT-NL project shows that refusing data permitted under EU law — in the name of "respecting copyright" — holds the model back. Sustaining Europe's AI ecosystem means rebuilding copyright as a right to be paid. Read more in @paul.eurosky.social's latest: openfuture.eu/blog/gpt-nl-...

GPT-NL respects copyright — cui bono? – Open Future

GPT-NL refuses training data that copyright law permits. The result is a model that cannot compete, highlighting why sustaining the information ecosystem requires the right to be paid rather than a ri...

openfuture.eu

Unconditional openness doesn't protect the commons when AI companies extract value from public collections at scale. It enables privatization. Analysis by @paul.eurosky.social responds to critiques of our proposed conditional access framework for cultural heritage data: openfuture.eu/blog/beyond-...

Beyond Control and Compensation – Open Future

Conditional access to cultural heritage data isn't about control. It is about reciprocity in a context where public collections are being extracted on an industrial scale.

openfuture.eu

🚀 Registrations are now open for the 2026 Institute for Information Law (IViR) Summer Course on International Copyright Law & Policy! Join us for an intensive 5-day program on international copyright law, featuring an incredible lineup of experts 🔗 Details & registration: www.ivir.nl/courses/icl/

Summer Course on International Copyright Law & Policy 2026 - IVIR

The Institute for Information Law organizes an annual intensive post-graduate course on international copyright law and policy. The face of copyright law and policy changes continuously, mostly due to...

ivir.nl

The proposed Digital Omnibus would allow public bodies to charge tech giants different fees for reusing public data. @paulk.bsky.social examines where this works—and where it adds unnecessary complexity—addressing the Paradox of Open and its implications for open data. openfuture.eu/blog/opennes...

Openness, Power, and the Paradox of Open Data in the Digital Omnibus – Open Future

The Digital Omnibus goes beyond technical fixes—the EU is finally acknowledging the Paradox of Open. Differentiated charging makes sense. Weakening standard licensing risks fragmentation.

openfuture.eu

This new impulse paper proposes a framework to help cultural heritage institutions balance their commitment to open access with the increasing AI-driven demand on their collections and infrastructure. ↘️

Open Future@openfuture.bsky.social · 8mo ago

🏛️How should cultural heritage institutions share data in the age of AI? Our new paper with @europeana.bsky.social explores when heritage data should be available for AI training. Part of the Alignment Assembly on Culture for AI. Read more: openfuture.eu/publication/...

I have been a paid subscriber to @404media.co since pretty much day 1. Easily the best $100 you can spend on the internet. Yesterday I accidentally heard their podcast with ads—I’d probably pay $100 just to avoid those cringe-worthy things alone.

📝 Voss's draft report on copyright & AI shows irony: questions his own framework only to circle back to it. His focus on remuneration and transparency offers pathways to a more sustainable information ecosystem. Read @paulk.bsky.social’s analysis: openfuture.eu/blog/licensi...

Licensing, Levies, and the Limits of Copyright – Open Future

MEP Axel Voss questions his own copyright framework while offering insights on remuneration and transparency for AI.

openfuture.eu

📄 New White Paper: "Beyond AI & Copyright: Funding a Sustainable Information Ecosystem." @paulk.bsky.social examines how AI impacts information control, argues for public AI models, and proposes a levy system on commercial AI services to support the digital commons. openfuture.eu/publication/...

Beyond AI and copyright – Open Future

This White Paper calls for a levy on commercial AI systems to fund public infrastructures and ensure a sustainable Digital Knowledge Commons in the generative AI era.

openfuture.eu