Paul Dixon

@pauldixon.bsky.social

By day: Mild-mannered climate geek working to decarbonize the power grid. By night: SF&F Author of Carpathians and more! Links: Owlskirk: https://a.co/d/5DE3Nq8 Carpathians: https://a.co/d/6lYc08V Starfall: https://a.co/d/hR5yHbL

Yup. This. Writing, like all creative endeavors, is about the journey. The process literally transforms the author, which is why the result can transform the reader. Skipping that step is exactly analogous to driving a marathon, helicoptering to a mountain-top -- pick your metaphor.

JP@jpbrammer.bsky.social · 18h ago

I wrote about AI, our relationship to pain and to comfort, and about why writing should hurt johnpaulbrammer.substack.com/p/writing-sh...

Apologies to those who know this already. If you're an aspiring author who submits a manuscript to what looks like a traditional publisher, and they write back saying that they adore your book but want you to pay £3k or so for an 'editing service'... Please don't sign with them.

For me, it comes down to this. What AI costs us is the change in the human that would have resulted from their doing the research (or performing any other focused task). It's not just skill erosion; it's not whether the end result is inferior; it's the lost value of the missing journey.

Waitman Wade Beorn, PhD, FRHistS@waitmanwbeorn.com · 4w ago

What? No. This is just more nonsense from the AI Koolaid-drinkers. And do you know what we call creating a "well-structured large historical dataset" and identifying a topic, analyzing sources, and writing? It's called the work of actual human historians. AI can't do this.