Tessera
Folgen

Peter Høst

@peterh78.bsky.social

I’m from Denmark 🇩🇰 I like football. Especially Arsenal. I often try to be funny but usually I’m not. Love wins. ❤️

455 Posts400 Follower170 Folgt
Peter Høst@peterh78.bsky.social · 5d ago

Vinicius does not want to play for Mourinho, and will therefore end up moving to Arsenal this month.

David Ornstein@david-ornstein.bsky.social · 5d ago

🚨 Vinicius Junior future entering crucial stage - meetings in coming days over extension at Real Madrid, free exit 2027 or join Arsenal now. #AFC all in & 26yo winger attracted by opportunity if no #RMFC renewal 🚨 W/ @gunnerblog.bsky.social @theathleticfc.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/athletic/748...

Peter Høst@peterh78.bsky.social · 5d ago

The English FA is a weak and unjust institution. Pathetic verdict for Chelsea, and still absolutely nothing about 115. But Everton can be deducted points. Ridiculous.

arseblog@arseblog.com · 6d ago

Carlos Cordeiro, Senior Advisor to Gianni Infantino quits, and urges other 'principled' people in FIFA to speak out against the sell-off plan. He also lays bare how unnecessary it is. 'The organisation sits on billions of dollars of reserves ...' 💵💵💵

As a Senior Advisor to the FIFA President, a former banker, and a lifelong football fan, I cannot stand by while FIFA considers selling a stake in the World Cup. Let me be clear: I had no involvement in this proposal, and I oppose it unequivocally. It is a bad deal for FIFA's Member Associations, a bad deal for football, and a bad deal for the long-term future of the game. Football has been central to my life, and after more than 35 years in banking, I understand both the value of this asset and the consequences of giving part of it away. That is why this proposal should be rejected. FIFA already has access to extraordinary financial resources. The organization sits on billions of dollars in reserves and no debt. The FIFA President himself has highlighted the $15 billion in revenue generated between 2022 and 2026. If Member Associations believe additional investment is needed to develop the game, FIFA already has the financial capacity to provide that support from its existing resources. Against that backdrop, selling a permanent stake in football's most valuable asset to raise $4.2 billion makes little sense. It is mortgaging football's future without any compelling justification. Most troubling of all is the absence of answers to fundamental questions. Why this deal? Why now? What oversight exists? Who benefits? Was there a competitive process? What governance will be in place? What will investors ultimately gain, and at what cost to football? After careful consideration, I can no longer continue in my role as Senior Advisor to the FIFA President. I have therefore resigned with immediate effect. It has been the privilege of a lifetime to serve FIFA for more than five years & to work alongside dedicated, principled people who care deeply about the game. I hope they, too, will speak up, because decisions of this magnitude should be made in the interests of football, not those who stand to profit from it.
Peter Høst@peterh78.bsky.social · 3w ago

What’s up with these 116 & 117 million deals? If Arsenal are to ‘break the bank’ on a player this summer I want the price to be 115 just to stick it to Man City.