planomenon

@planomenon.assemblag.es.ap.brid.gy

Hi, I am A, lives in Sweden. English/swedish. Low frequency. Quantum physics PhD and BFA (fine arts). Critical engineer/artist looking for friends and […] [bridged from https://assemblag.es/@planomenon on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]

Progressives waste time pretending our salvation is “messaging.” Our problem is that we have no way to distribute messages that can be heard above the near-ubiquity of MAGA media. 100,000 Substacks and TikToks are not a message delivery system. They’re a message diffusion system.

"What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. ... Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance."

Of course, modelling (more is different) and not "exact simulation" is the paradigm. However just accurate simulation of neurons or the nematode worm as a complex system, shows the difficulties for those wanting unified/exhaustive models of complexity. Especially cognition (see earlier posts).

Nunes however would never rule out these tactics in themselves but rather propose we think about an "ecology of political practices" of technopolitics. Eg. how could Luddite sabotage or perma-computing work side by side with parties and governance building parallell tech stacks?

Ricardo Nunes "horizontalism vs verticalism" holds for technopolitics too? Feral/perma-computing, artisanal unbloated and prefigurative software, luddist sabotage. Vs tech-keynesian fully automated AI positive stack geopolitics. Both fetishize org. form and are reactive melancholic towards other?