Patrick Marsh

@pmarshwx.com

* Christian; Husband; Dad * SPC Chief of Science & Support * OBU Assistant Professor of Natural Science * Former Bear poker turned Bear

That was a *special* set of 7 overnight outlook shifts. Nothing like setting yourself up for the atmosphere to make you look like a fool. And the best part is, we save it for everyone else to go back and re-read it!

First and foremost … CONGRATULATIONS!!!! I HAD NO IDEA YOU TWO WERE DATING!!!! Secondly … we need to have a conversation about keeping things from your boss! 😉 Thirdly … This better not impede development on Heimdall or I’m sending you back to indoctrination camp! Fourthly ... Can I officiate?!?

Kelton Halbert@stormscale.io · 2mo ago

Today, I hit a pretty big life moment and got engaged to my best friend and favorite person in the world. Got so nervous that I accidentally placed myself behind the railing. Oh well 🙃😂. Celebrated with a lovely picnic in Central Park!

For clarity: SPC does not run any numerical model. We use the official models run by NOAA. What Kelton is saying is that SPC will choose which members of the REFS and potentially other available CAMs to form our own “ensemble” for SPC post processed guidance and ensemble probability calculations.

Kelton Halbert@stormscale.io · 3mo ago

SPC will be running its own config of the REFS once HREF retires (SPC REFS). It incorporates the HRRR since it’ll still be around, and removes members that have undesirable convective characteristics due to their convective schemes. It stops some of the bleeding, but it’s going to be a big change.

Air travel is so predictable these days … You travel 10 miles or nearly 700,000 miles only to arrive at your destination on time and still have to wait an hour for a gate to open so you can exit the aircraft …

For completeness, I am not mad, upset, or hold any ill will toward the author of the now deleted post. As I posted last week, I have said far worse about far better people than this. I bet most reading this have all said something that was regretted or poorly phrased. I am a stable genius though 🤪

Patrick Marsh@pmarshwx.com · 5mo ago

It’s me! 👋🏻 I’m the genius mentioned below responsible for implementation. Did I achieve “stable genius” status?!?!

It’s me! 👋🏻 I’m the genius mentioned below responsible for implementation. Did I achieve “stable genius” status?!?!

Post nicht verfügbar.

It was not very long ago we were getting bashed for not talking up an event enough. The take away: unless SPC is perfect, we will be bashed by someone. Comes with the territory. I am good with this because it means people are listening. If people said nothing, that would be worse.

Brian Matilla@bxmatilla.bsky.social · 5mo ago

It’s a bit demoralizing to see SPC get bashed as much as they are for how today’s event isn’t living up to the so-called hype. Are there failure modes which have led to the lack of widespread severe? 100% yes. It will never be a perfect science, but this means there’s that much more to learn.

I have publicly criticized my fair share of the weather enterprise as I tried to make a name for myself, especially when I was younger. I wish I knew then what I know now. And this not-so-vague vague thread is not directed at any one person or entity. But rather a reflection come full circle.

Bild

Today is SPC's first explicit forecast of significant tornadoes possible (CIG1) in a tornado probability less than 10%. Based on radar data and environment a significant tornado may have occurred in parts of that forecast area. SPC could not have explicitly forecast this kind of scenario previously.

Here is a fun hazing ritual … err … challenge … Write coherent meteorological discussions, for multiple days, in the middle of the night. Then do it several more nights in a row. For me it has been convective outlooks for Days 2, 3, and 4-8. Finding my words gets harder each subsequent night!