Polity, Journal of Political Science

@polityalsberuf.bsky.social

Co-Editors-in-Cheif: @alysoncole18.bsky.social, Robyn Marasco, and Charles Tien. Journal of the @northeasternpsa.bsky.social, published by @uchicagopress.bsky.social.

Our latest #AskAPoliticalScientist features Joan Tronto, Professor at the University of Minnesota. She explains her turn to care ethics, how to distinguish good from bad care, and reframes care as political activity requiring democratic accountability. Read it: journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...

A Conversation with Joan Tronto about Making Good Care a Central Concern of Political Life | Polity: Vol 58, No 2

journals.uchicago.edu

Stephen Cucharo’s “John Rawls and Liberal Guilt” reexamines liberal guilt through Rawls. He argues it reflects an ambivalent emotion rooted in conflicting attachments with political potential. @stevecucharo.bsky.social Read it now: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/... #PoliSky #PoliticalTheory

John Rawls and Liberal Guilt | Polity: Vol 58, No 2

In contemporary political commentary, “liberal guilt” represents a cynical attempt to express moral concern without engaging in genuine and transformative action. This critique, however, overlooks a reading of “liberal guilt” as an expression of a conflict that cannot be worked through, namely a commitment to a suffering other to whom one feels indebted, and an attachment to a specific political arrangement from which one extracts benefits. This ambivalence, I suggest, produces forms of “moral paralysis” or the production of gestures that do not disturb the terms of liberal consensus. My aim is to explore how this contradiction is expressed in liberal thought through a psychoanalytic reading of Rawls’s A Theory of Justice. The paper proceeds as follows: first, I will show how Rawls productively uses the work of Melanie Klein to ground guilt-feelings on terms other than those offered by Freud. Here, guilt is an expression of value that begets reparative gestures towards another. However, for Rawls, guilt can be expressed only in compressed and exchange-based terms that permit a return to political equilibrium and consensus. This means Rawls’s subject is endowed with a paranoid attachment to order, which dictates how guilt can be felt and enacted politically in relation to others. I show how this narration of guilt in Rawls’s thought gives theorists leverage to rethink “liberal guilt” as an expression of a contradiction between both paranoid and solidaristic attachments. Last, I show how “liberal guilt” may present itself as a site of political possibility.

journals.uchicago.edu

This issue’s #AskaPoliticalScientist spotlights Anne Norton, Professor at the University of Pennsylvania. She reflects on her path into political theory and argues scholarship must be grounded in lived reality—not fleeting trends—to tackle today’s issues. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...

“If It’s a Lie, It Must Be Important”: An Interview with Anne Norton on Identity, Property, and the Study of Politics | Polity: Vol 58, No 1

journals.uchicago.edu

Natasha Piano’s “The Minimalist Marxist” reflects on Adam Przeworski’s impact, arguing his study of Marxist ideology advanced research methods and encouraged a more holistic merging of subfields. Read it here: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/... #PoliticalTheory #PoliSky #Marxism

The Minimalist Marxist: How Adam Przeworski United Political Science with Democracy as Free and Fair Election | Polity: Vol 57, No 4

journals.uchicago.edu