David TS Fraser

@privacylawyer.ca

Canadian internet and privacy law counsel to global companies.

I remember the Portapique mass casualty. I remember the public inquiry that followed it. Apparently the RCMP doesn't. This is unacceptable: "a spokesperson for the RCMP said the police force does not share information used in its operational decisions." www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

Subject of 'dangerous man' alert killed by N.S. Mountie hours after public told risk was over | CBC News

Questions are being raised about the Nova Scotia RCMP's decision to call off an emergency alert warning the public of an armed and dangerous man — who was later shot and killed by police — while he wa...

cbc.ca

The mere idea of regulating an encyclopedia is so offensive to freedom of expression. Canadian notions of freedom of expression came from the UK, but I'm glad we put it in our constitution before the UK completely lost it. wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/07...

Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations – Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is the backbone of knowledge on the internet. Learn how the Wikimedia Foundation is safeguarding it under the UK Online Safety Act.

wikimediafoundation.org

The most RCMP paragraph ever: "During the RCMP response, an officer discharged their firearm. The man sustained injuries consistent with a gun shot wound." Oh, and this was released a full day after the incident, which had led to an emergency alert in the community. rcmp.ca/en/nova-scot...

Nova Scotia RCMP refers incident to Serious Incident Response Team after officer discharges firearm while responding to weapon call

Lunenburg District RCMP responded to a report of a person in possession of a firearm who was linked to an ongoing investigation. During the response, an RCMP officer discharged their service weapon.

rcmp.ca

I have an infinite amount of time for David Loukidelis and his thoughtful views. There will be a LOT of discussion about the new regulator proposed in Bill C-36 Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act, and everyone's thinking will be better informed by listening to this.

Michael Geist@mgeist.bsky.social · last mo.

David Loukidelis was BC’s Privacy Commissioner for a decade and enforced its private-sector privacy law from day one. He joins Law Bytes podcast to discuss why Bill C-36 creates unnecessary risks to Canadian privacy with its shocking enforcement changes.

The government defends Bill C-22's mandatory metadata retention as consistent with its Five Eyes allies. But the US never imposed such a mandate, and this week its Supreme Court ruled that even two hours of location data is a search the state must justify.

Shaky Ground Gets Shakier: What the U.S. Supreme Court's Location Data Decision Means for Bill C-22 - Michael Geist

When the government rushed Bill C-22 through the House of Commons last month, it defended the lawful access mandatory metadata retention requirement as consistent with similar rules established by…

michaelgeist.ca

This guy was convicted of creating deedfaked nude images of (now) women using photos from when they were 17. I want to know why he wasn't charged with a CSAM offence. Halifax woman sues over AI deepfake nude images of her as a minor www.saltwire.com/nova-scotia/...

Halifax woman sues man who made AI deepfake nude images of her as a minor

A Halifax area woman is suing the man who used Artificial Intelligence to make a sexualized deepfake of her as a minor

saltwire.com

TIL malls throughout the country are increasingly restricting minors. Some even require mandatory ID checks for anyone who looks young. So teens can't go to the mall, they can't be online...where exactly do we expect them to go? www.youthrights.org/issues/age-d...

Malls Banning Teens: Parental Escort & Chaperoning Policies

How many Malls Ban Unaccompanied Minors? Malls with Youth Curfews. Malls with Parental guidance policies, Youth Escort policies, Parental Chaperoning policies.

youthrights.org

If you want a good example of a "think of the children" law that limited expression online and was prone to abuse that was trashed because of its infringement of constitutional rights, I present Crouch v Snell: www.canlii.org/en/ns/nssc/d...

canlii.org

David TS Fraser@privacylawyer.ca · 2mo ago

Is Canada's teen social media ban constitutional? It's complicated: Legal experts warn Bill C-34 could leave federal government open to legal challenges www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

An absolutely shameful statement by Steven MacKinnon. Every organization with a long track record of expert commentary on the rule of law in Canada condemned the bill. "Liberals dismiss ‘tinfoil hat’ privacy fears as lawful access bill passes" globalnews.ca/news/1191195...

Liberals dismiss ‘tinfoil hat’ privacy fears as lawful access bill passes - National | Globalnews.ca

Conservatives and other opposition parties sought to address privacy concerns in Bill C-22, but the Liberal government shut down debate and fast-tracked the bill.

globalnews.ca

With Gary Anandasangaree invoking "you're with us or with the criminals" language as the government seeks to shut down debate on Bill C-22, he would do well to remember how Liberal MPs reacted to that approach years ago on a different lawful access bill. bsky.app/profile/mgei...

BildBild
Michael Geist@mgeist.bsky.social · 2mo ago

In 2012, Liberals condemned Vic Toews for telling lawful access critics they could “stand with us or with the child pornographers." Now Gary Anandasangaree, shutting down C-22 debate, tells critics to "choose" between police and victims. Same shameful playbook.