Tessera
Folgen

Proportional Commons

@propvoting.bsky.social

Recounting UK House of Commons divisions in proportion to the GE24 popular vote. See FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7 #MakeVotesMatter #ProportionalRepresentation Previously @PropVoting on Twitter.

1841 Posts4449 Follower549 Folgt
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-15: Code of Practice on Electronic and Workplace Ballots for TW Ballots The 330 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,614,285 voters. The 109 MPs voting 'No' represented 9,440,589 voters. Aye majority = 173,696 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-15: Code of Practice on Electronic and Workplace Ballots for TW Ballots The 330 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,614,285 voters. The 109 MPs voting 'No' represented 9,440,589 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-15: Trade Unions (Permissible Means of Voting & fair Dismissal) Order 2026 The 330 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,614,285 voters. The 109 MPs voting 'No' represented 9,440,589 voters. Aye majority = 173,696 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-15: Trade Unions (Permissible Means of Voting & fair Dismissal) Order 2026 The 330 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,614,285 voters. The 109 MPs voting 'No' represented 9,440,589 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 19 The 104 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,577,717 voters. The 407 MPs voting 'No' represented 13,517,977 voters. No majority = 4,940,260 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report Stage: Amendment 19 The 104 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,577,717 voters. The 407 MPs voting 'No' represented 13,517,977 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill: Amendment 199 The 101 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,403,007 voters. The 404 MPs voting 'No' represented 13,428,555 voters. No majority = 5,025,548 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill: Amendment 199 The 101 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,403,007 voters. The 404 MPs voting 'No' represented 13,428,555 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

@jessbrownfullermp.bsky.social Here's the proportional recount of your amendment today. As you see, it would have passed if seats matched votes. bsky.app/profile/prop...

Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report stage: Amendment 3 The 90 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,192,379 voters. The 322 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,719,099 voters. Aye majority = 473,280 But result was No because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report stage: Amendment 3 The 90 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,192,379 voters. The 322 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,719,099 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report stage: Amendment 3 The 90 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,192,379 voters. The 322 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,719,099 voters. Aye majority = 473,280 But result was No because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-14: Public Office (Accountability) Bill Report stage: Amendment 3 The 90 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,192,379 voters. The 322 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,719,099 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-13: Immigration and Asylum Bill: Second Reading The 263 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 6,246,717 voters. The 89 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,496,213 voters. No majority = 1,249,496 But result was Aye because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-13: Immigration and Asylum Bill: Second Reading The 263 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 6,246,717 voters. The 89 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,496,213 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 3w ago

2026-07-13: Immigration and Asylum Bill: Amendment to Second Reading The 97 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,844,359 voters. The 355 MPs voting 'No' represented 12,121,653 voters. No majority = 3,277,294 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-13: Immigration and Asylum Bill: Amendment to Second Reading The 97 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 8,844,359 voters. The 355 MPs voting 'No' represented 12,121,653 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 4w ago

2026-07-08: Town and Country Planning (Discharge of Local Planning Functions) Regs 2026 The 283 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 6,759,599 voters. The 182 MPs voting 'No' represented 11,889,300 voters. No majority = 5,129,701 But result was Aye because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-08: Town and Country Planning (Discharge of Local Planning Functions) Regs 2026 The 283 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 6,759,599 voters. The 182 MPs voting 'No' represented 11,889,300 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 4w ago

2026-07-08: Supply of Machinery (Safety) and EU Machinery Regulation (NI) Regs 2026 The 317 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,396,795 voters. The 103 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,968,800 voters. Aye majority = 2,427,995 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-08: Supply of Machinery (Safety) and EU Machinery Regulation (NI) Regs 2026 The 317 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,396,795 voters. The 103 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,968,800 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · 4w ago

2026-07-08: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act(Consequential Amendments) Regs 2026 The 369 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 11,880,846 voters. The 102 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,910,563 voters. Aye majority = 4,970,283 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-08: Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act(Consequential Amendments) Regs 2026 The 369 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 11,880,846 voters. The 102 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,910,563 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-07-06: National Security (State Threats) Bill: to agree to LA 1 The 392 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 12,677,175 voters. The 85 MPs voting 'No' represented 4,969,372 voters. Aye majority = 7,707,803 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-06: National Security (State Threats) Bill: to agree to LA 1 The 392 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 12,677,175 voters. The 85 MPs voting 'No' represented 4,969,372 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-07-01: Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: NC 5 The 176 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 12,094,535 voters. The 306 MPs voting 'No' represented 8,653,118 voters. Aye majority = 3,441,417 But result was No because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-01: Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: NC 5 The 176 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 12,094,535 voters. The 306 MPs voting 'No' represented 8,653,118 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-07-01: Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: NC 4 The 172 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 11,864,428 voters. The 276 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,582,234 voters. Aye majority = 5,282,194 But result was No because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-01: Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: NC 4 The 172 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 11,864,428 voters. The 276 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,582,234 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-07-01: Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: NC 2 The 78 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 7,148,982 voters. The 277 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,605,985 voters. Aye majority = 542,997 But result was No because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-01: Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill Committee: NC 2 The 78 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 7,148,982 voters. The 277 MPs voting 'No' represented 6,605,985 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-07-01: Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 2026 The 318 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,461,420 voters. The 107 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,994,303 voters. Aye majority = 1,467,117 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-01: Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 2026 The 318 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,461,420 voters. The 107 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,994,303 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-07-01: Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) Regulations 2026 The 323 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,710,681 voters. The 107 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,994,303 voters. Aye majority = 1,716,378 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-07-01: Employment Tribunal (Extension of Time Limits) Regulations 2026 The 323 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 9,710,681 voters. The 107 MPs voting 'No' represented 7,994,303 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-06-24: Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Credit Limit) Order 2026 The 327 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 10,870,279 voters. The 92 MPs voting 'No' represented 8,107,973 voters. Aye majority = 2,762,306 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-06-24: Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Credit Limit) Order 2026 The 327 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 10,870,279 voters. The 92 MPs voting 'No' represented 8,107,973 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-06-24: Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Int'l Aviation and Shipping) Regs 2026 The 323 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 10,826,118 voters. The 93 MPs voting 'No' represented 8,166,209 voters. Aye majority = 2,659,909 See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-06-24: Draft Climate Change Act 2008 (Int'l Aviation and Shipping) Regs 2026 The 323 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 10,826,118 voters. The 93 MPs voting 'No' represented 8,166,209 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7
Proportional Commons@propvoting.bsky.social · last mo.

2026-06-24: Customs (Tariff and Misc Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2026 The 323 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 7,836,217 voters. The 160 MPs voting 'No' represented 11,512,249 voters. No majority = 3,676,032 But result was Aye because seats don't match votes. See ALT text and 🧵

This chart is a proportional recount of a vote in the House of Commons. The top two bars show the number of MPs from each party who voted Aye or No in the division. The bottom two bars show the number of voters those MPs represent. For example, if a party won two million votes in the general election and half of that party's MPs voted in the division, that would represent one million voters. 2026-06-24: Customs (Tariff and Misc Amdts) (#4) Regulations 2026 The 323 MPs voting 'Aye' represented 7,836,217 voters. The 160 MPs voting 'No' represented 11,512,249 voters. In many cases, more voters are represented by the MPs on the losing side. This is because seats don't match votes with First Past the Post (FPTP). Recounts are shown in terms of ideal MPs who all represent the same number of people. The method is not a simulation of a PR elected Commons. It is intended to highlight the distortion of FPTP. For more details, see the FAQ: https://tinyurl.com/4hxyc8e7