Paul Holmes

@provokepaul.bsky.social

Founder & CEO at PRovokeMedia, I have been writing, speaking and thinking about public relations for 40 years. (If I blocked you, either you said something Trump-y or you disabled quote posts).

Got to say, I thought Geno Smith at 30 was generous, but then I saw the 5 rated lower and yeah... probably about right. Rogers in the top 20 is the pick that's going to look bad by the end of the season.

The Athletic@theathletic.com · yesterday

Our 2026 NFL Quarterback Tiers results are here. The panel this year consisted of 21 execs and 29 coaches overall. Each voter placed 35 veteran QBs into five tiers, from best (Tier 1) to worst (Tier 5). nyti.ms/4yYcfln

The rightward shift of the Democratic Party since the days of FDR and LBJ is not just a story nobody has covered... the majority of the media will pretend the opposite is true. Look at how we pay CEOs, tax companies and the rich--issues Ds have enabled--and tell me we have a left of center party.

Oliver Willis@owillis.bsky.social · 2d ago

correct. obama took office with a 7 percent popular vote and 182 electoral vote majority, a democratic house and senate, and even he acted like republicans had put him in a toddler chair at the big boy table.

The only sane use of the navy under these circumstances would br humanitarian: to help these people reach shore safely. The fact that nobody is even suggesting that is an indication of how badly British values have declined.

Paul Bernal@paulbernal.bsky.social · 3d ago

We've had these 'send in the navy' plans on and off for decades. It doesn't work. It won't work. It can't work. You won't convince the navy to sink unarmed dinghies full of people. That's not how they work. Performative viciousness, that's all.

It is, actually, an interesting story, and thanks for the gift article. Now maybe somebody could tell us how and why the Times itself went from "standing up to Trump to bending the knee." Because that has had far more damaging consequences.

Bill Grueskin@bgrueskin.bsky.social · 3d ago

This is one deeply reported, beautifully written (or edited) story, and you should find time this Sunday morning to read every word of it. 1/2 Gift link www.nytimes.com/2026/08/02/u...

Nowhere does she say that the person who beat her took money from AIPAC. If you are denying that AIPAC spent money to defeat her, you are delusional. If anti-semitism in the Democratic Party is on the rise, AIPAC is a major cause.

EthanObama@ethanobama.bsky.social · 6d ago

The person who beat her didn't take any money from AIPAC. So what is the lesson here? It's not about AIPAC or money in politics. It's about using antisemitism to infiltrate and destroy the Democratic Party.