Resistance Psychology Network

@psychresist.bsky.social

Follow for updates on the Psychology of Resistance Virtual Meeting Series. resistancepsych.blogspot.com Link to edited volume: https://t.co/WYMrhucfua

Remember to register for joining this stimulating session on the meaning, content, reasons, and possible trajectories and challenges of civil disobedience in times of climate catastrophe with Robin Celikates on Monday! tinyurl.com/civil-disob

Resistance Psychology Network@psychresist.bsky.social · 2mo ago

The next session of Psychology of Resistance Virtual Meetings is next Monday, June 15! We do an interactive session with @robin-c.bsky.social on Civil Disobedience in Times of Climate Catastrophe, followed by a moderated discussion from diverse perspectives. To register: tinyurl.com/civil-disob

Civil Disobedience in Times of Climate Catastrophe: Philosophical, Conceptual, and Social Psychological Questions 
The Psychology of Resistance Virtual Meeting Series
Robin Celikates
Freie Universität Berlin
Monday, June 15, 2026
Vancouver 7.00 am; Mexico City 8.00 am; New York 10.00 am; Berlin 16.00; Ramallah 17.00; Istanbul 17.00; New Delhi 19.30; Jakarta 21.00
As climate activism more frequentlyinvolves direct challenges to the modernproperty regime, it triggers responsesfrom the state that defend this regime.This defense combines repression – byway of policing, surveillance,imprisonment etc.- with willfulmanipulation and ideological obfuscationregarding the relevant categories,including the very category of civildisobedience and the potential meaningsof ‘radical’ protest. Against thisbackground, my contribution will advancethree claims: 1) In response to neoauthoritarian tendencies to repress anddelegitimize protest – especially protestframed as ‘radical’–, it is crucial, for boththeoretical and political reasons, tounderstand what civil disobedienceentails and why it is called civil, even ifits ends and/or means may appear asradical. 2) Civil disobedience, properlyunderstood, can entail acts usuallyconsidered to be violent (and thus ‘tooradical’), namely the destruction,deactivation, or damaging of property(especially climate disruptive machinery, infrastructure and equipment). 3) In theface of climate catastrophe, there areadditional strong reasons – beyondestablished, more general radicaldemocratic arguments – to stretch thelimits of the civil beyond its narrowliberal and conventionalist interpretation.In this interactive session (90 min), Dr. Celikates will address these questions,followed by moderated discussionbringing together philosophical, socialpsychological and activist perspectives.

Did you miss this stimulating session? Do you want to recollect some thoughts or discussions from the content? Great! This was a recorded session based on participants' consents and it is now available in the Resistance Psychology Network's Youtube channel: www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfIQ...

Rethinking Protest Tactics and Allyship in Contexts of Repression

YouTube video by Resistance Psychology Network

youtube.com

Resistance Psychology Network@psychresist.bsky.social · 9mo ago

The next session of Psychology of Resistance Virtual Meetings is next Monday, November 10: We do a peer review as conversation with @metesefauysal.bsky.social on confrontational-disruptive protests, @yasemingacar.bsky.social and Carmen Marazzi as discusants To register: tinyurl.com/disruptive-p...

Beyond Dichotomies: Rethinking Protest Tactics and How They Shape Allyship by Mete Sefa Uysal (university of Exeter)

Peer Review as Conversation (90 Minutes)

Reviewers: Yasemin Gülsüm Acar (St Andrews University) and Carmen Marazzi (Clark University)

Abstract:
Allyship in social movements does not emerge in a vacuum. It unfolds in contested political and moral contexts where the tactics used by marginalised groups play a critical role in shaping support from the general public. Yet, existing scholarship often collapses diverse protest forms into binary categories like normative vs. nonnormative or conventional vs. radical. Recent studies on confrontational collective action (Uysal et al., 2024,2025) challenge existing categorisations that treat protest tactics as fixed and morally preferable over one another. It sees protest tactics as a continuum in which they coexist within activists’ repertoires of resistance and shifts the focus to the conditions under which individuals transition between tactics against repression. Following this critique, I aim to discuss when confrontational and disruptive actions hinder and catalyse solidarity and allyship, rather than treating them as inherently alienating.

Register here: http://tinyurl.com/disruptive-protest

Monday, November 10, 2025
Vancouver, Canada: 9:00; New York, United States: 12:00; London, United Kingdom: 17:00; Ramallah, Palestine: 19:00

The picture includes a headshot of Mete Sefa Uysal wearing glasses and a vertically striped shirt in a green leafy background. The picture also includes a QR code for the registration link also added to the original post.

Happening next Monday! Remember to register to go beyond the conceptual binaries of protests as normative vs non-normative, conventional vs radical and to dig in why and how individuals shift protest tactics with Mete Sefa presenting, Yasemin & Carmen acting as reviewers. tinyurl.com/disruptive-p...

Resistance Psychology Network@psychresist.bsky.social · 9mo ago

The next session of Psychology of Resistance Virtual Meetings is next Monday, November 10: We do a peer review as conversation with @metesefauysal.bsky.social on confrontational-disruptive protests, @yasemingacar.bsky.social and Carmen Marazzi as discusants To register: tinyurl.com/disruptive-p...

Beyond Dichotomies: Rethinking Protest Tactics and How They Shape Allyship by Mete Sefa Uysal (university of Exeter)

Peer Review as Conversation (90 Minutes)

Reviewers: Yasemin Gülsüm Acar (St Andrews University) and Carmen Marazzi (Clark University)

Abstract:
Allyship in social movements does not emerge in a vacuum. It unfolds in contested political and moral contexts where the tactics used by marginalised groups play a critical role in shaping support from the general public. Yet, existing scholarship often collapses diverse protest forms into binary categories like normative vs. nonnormative or conventional vs. radical. Recent studies on confrontational collective action (Uysal et al., 2024,2025) challenge existing categorisations that treat protest tactics as fixed and morally preferable over one another. It sees protest tactics as a continuum in which they coexist within activists’ repertoires of resistance and shifts the focus to the conditions under which individuals transition between tactics against repression. Following this critique, I aim to discuss when confrontational and disruptive actions hinder and catalyse solidarity and allyship, rather than treating them as inherently alienating.

Register here: http://tinyurl.com/disruptive-protest

Monday, November 10, 2025
Vancouver, Canada: 9:00; New York, United States: 12:00; London, United Kingdom: 17:00; Ramallah, Palestine: 19:00

The picture includes a headshot of Mete Sefa Uysal wearing glasses and a vertically striped shirt in a green leafy background. The picture also includes a QR code for the registration link also added to the original post.