Brave female warrior

@qiheyu.bsky.social

#RESIST Real Estate, Animal lover 🐩🐶 ❤️Coffee ☕️❤️Music🎶 VOTE 🌊💙💙#PROCHOICE #HUMANRIGHTS #ANIMALRIGHTS

This is the result of this incompetent administration placing racist, trigger-happy, resentful thugs who still wear police badges into ICE: wrongful deaths and miscarriages of justice, and personal suffering. Abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement!

MeidasTouch@meidastouch.com · 3mo ago

SHOCK NYT REPORT: DHS now admits the man ICE killed in Houston wasn't even their target. Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a 35-year U.S. resident, was just driving to work when agents — with no body cameras — shot him dead searching for two other men who weren't even in the van. Gift link in reply.

Ezra Klein is the kind of person who, if conservatives were the mainstream, would be a conservative himself. He is the kind of person commonly found in academia who takes a left-wing stance on national politics but criticizes faculty and student unions at the local level.

Nate O@nateo.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I think it's a moral abomination for Ezra Klein to have Chris Rufo on his podcast and then get a transcript of it published in The New York Times as if this is a conversation between equals and not a radical centrist and a fascist telling each other 'exaaaaactlyyyy'

Another argument you make in that piece is: “The popular slogan that ‘facts don’t care about your feelings’ betrays similar problems” — the slogan being Ben Shapiro’s.
In reality, feelings almost always overpower facts. Reason is a slave of the passions.

Yes, that’s true, and we’ll caveat — we love Ben Shapiro. We’re Ben Shapiro fans, of course. But I think that he’s very wrong on that, and I think conservatives have made a fundamental error in latching on to that.

And really, what it is — it’s a rationalization for losing. It’s like: Yes, we may have lost the great political question that operates on emotions or passions, but we have the facts on our side, and if only people would read our white paper, our regression analysis or our rigorous logical argumentation, then we would be vindicated.

But look, while we should have the facts on our side, and while we should use logic, by itself, it’s insufficient. And, in fact, politics operates on a deeper level, an emotional level. And politics occurs on the field of sentiment and public opinion — much more on the field of abstract argumentation at the top.

Then you go on in the same piece to make an argument for “agitprop” — an old Soviet Union term for agitation and propaganda mashed up together.

It doesn’t have a great reputation — “agitprop” is usually not a term of endearment. But you say: “Agitprop doesn’t mean sacrificing the truth but, rather, channeling the truth toward victory.”