Renato Duarte

@rcfduarte.bsky.social

Computational Neuroscience & Neural Computation https://rcfduarte.github.io/ https://www.comp-neuro.org/ https://groundedneuro.substack.com

Heading to Halifax for #CNS2026! 🇨🇦 Milestone year: it’s the first time my entire (small) group is attending together, showcasing results from our FCT exploratory project. If you're attending, drop by our posters or grab us during the social events to chat. See you in Halifax! 🧠💻

Bild

Wilson–Cowan. FitzHugh–Nagumo. Brunel. Kuramoto. The detailed models that motivated those reductions are mostly forgotten outside their original communities. The reductions are still being taught. A field note on why every mechanistic model deserves a small theoretical cousin.

Conceptual Reduction as a Research Tool

Most of the modeling work I do aims at maintaining a high degree of biological fidelity while elucidating computational primitives.

open.substack.com

New Field Note: a Deep dive into the work of our guest lecturers this week. Three papers from the Dynamical Inference lab on contrastive learning for neural time series—CEBRA, DCL, xCEBRA. What identifiability actually means, when you need dynamics modeling, applications and implications.

Contrastive Learning for Neural Dynamics: Deep Dive

Over the past week, I’ve been involved in organizing an Advanced Course on Systems and Computational Neuroscience. Offering modern perspectives via guest lectures and extensive practical tutorials, we...

open.substack.com

First journal club post: aiming for a weekly update on what I have been reading and annotating (deep dives), what new papers sparked my interest and joined the reading list (new papers on deck) and an attempt to make sense of it all. open.substack.com/pub/grounded...

Journal Club: Cell-type-specific dendritic integration and canonical cortical circuits

Dendrites are not passive cables dutifully delivering synaptic inputs to the soma, but active computational elements that shape what neurons respond to and when.

open.substack.com

Out now in Nature from @behrenstimb.bsky.social and crew: www.nature.com/articles/s41... Understanding this kind of schematic pattern learning and transfer will be key, IMO, to moving towards models of what we might call "higher-order cognition" or "reasoning". 🧠📈 🧪

A cellular basis for mapping behavioural structure - Nature

Mice generalize complex task structures by using neurons in the medial frontal cortex that encode progress to task goals and embed behavioural sequences.

nature.com

This can be an argument for why normative modeling (optimization) may fail beyond the sensory areas of the brain. In the case of ANN models, there won’t be a finite set of loss functions that can lead to learning the whole range of neural dynamics, due to the unboundedness of real-world scenarios.

Jared Peterson@jaredpeterson.bsky.social · 2y ago

Three formal arguments for why there cannot be a finite set of cognitive biases. The lack of a finite set of biases is one reason I believe Heuristics and Biases cannot survive long term as a prescriptive paradigm. A paradigm of deviations must eventually collapse under its own weight.