the other Rebecca, PhD

@rebelipar.bsky.social

Schadenfreude appreciator, cat person, terminally online, bike commuter, amateur (film) photographer, EmoryUnite! (SEIU/WU Local 29) bargaining committee member-emeritus, postdoc in my spare time. VA → NOLA → RVA → ATL → Philly! (She/her)

I should have done more catching up on work today, but it was too lovely outside to stay inside. And, shout out to Previous Me for refreshing my sealant before leaving the house because halfway through this I was *so* close to getting a flat. Never had a tire hiss out so much sealant before!

wandrer screenshot of a bike ride around West and South Philadelphia with 5.4 new miles

I'm going to be thinking about this for a while, lol. Why in the world would faculty get any input into whether postdocs unionize? Thinking they would is *exactly* why the postdocs are unionizing. Seriously the stupidest shit I have read in a while. Beyond parody.

the other Rebecca, PhD@rebelipar.bsky.social · last wk.

Why would comments be solicited about a unionization vote? Once the cards are submitted and the NLRB finds that a sufficient number have been signed, there has to be an election, it's illegal not to. (It should also be illegal to talk about unions with this little knowledge.)

Is unionization of postdocs on the rise? Yes. Has there been much thoughtful discussion in the scientific community of the consequences? No. On March 26, the Yale University faculty were notified of an impending vote on unionization by postdocs—but no date for a vote was announced. A second email, on April 20, announced the election on April 29 and April 30. No comments were solicited. So much for seeking informed opinions before acting. On May 1, we received a third email from the provost. Not surprisingly, the postdocs had voted to unionize. In a tally reminiscent of Pravda, we were informed the vote was 859 to 31. So much for diversity of thought.

This shit happens everywhere, and still somehow there are people in university admin who don't understand why we want unions. THIS IS WHY WE WANT UNIONS (Yes, also to push for better pay and benefits, but really it's so that we can call out the fuckers and not get fired over it.)

the other Rebecca, PhD@rebelipar.bsky.social · 2mo ago

www.science.org/content/arti... Despite being a circadian researcher, I'm bad at names (and, sorry, I haven't paid that much attention to last authors, being a "first author stage" person) so I only heard about this guy like two months ago. Happy to return to not knowing who he is.

Tiffany Chin, a graduate student at Salk who left Panda’s lab in April, said the research assistant approached her in late February. She told Chin that Panda had been harassing her, including giving her massages in his office. She said on one occasion she turned down a foot massage, and he later screamed at her that she would never make it in science, which “scared her,” Chin told Science in a text. “It made her realize that unless she complies with him that she’d lose her letter of recommendation, might get fired, etc.” The research assistant also showed Chin texts Panda sent her that she found inappropriate. She told Chin she planned to make a formal complaint against Panda to Salk’s human resources (HR) department.

Other people who spoke with the research assistant said she reported that Panda had drunk alcohol with her in his office and made sexually explicit references in conversation. One person Science spoke with witnessed Panda regularly meeting with the research assistant for hours in his office—far more time than he usually spent with his postdocs and graduate students. “She was the favorite among the lab personnel—[the favorites] were mostly women,” the person says.