πŸ”žβ€ π•½π–”π–˜π–Šβ€  🏴󠁧󠁒󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 ( Comms Open 4/5 )

@rosefilledcoffin.bsky.social

✧ β„Œπ”’/β„Œπ”Άπ”ͺ𝔫/𝔗π”₯𝔒𝔢 ✧ 𝔄𝔩𝔩 𝔠π”₯π”žπ”―π”žπ” π”±π”’π”―π”° π”žπ”―π”’ 21+ ✧ † ℭ𝔒𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔣𝔦𝔒𝔑 𝔐𝔬𝔫𝔰𝔱𝔒𝔯𝔣𝔲𝔠𝔨𝔒𝔯 † #sona = me / #oc = mine / #roseadopts 🚫NO AI🚫 πŸ”žπ•„π•€β„•π•†β„π•Š 𝔻ℕ𝕀( #`βŒ‚Β΄)/

If SCREEN were to pass, you'd be required to scan your face and upload an ID to access this site because it allows "harmful" material. This affects you even if you don't care about sex work or porn.

404 Media@404media.co Β· yesterday

Mike Lee's SCREEN Act, which heads to Senate Commerce Committee for markup on Wednesday, would expand age verification requirements to a nearly limitless scope of websites, and is supported by the architects of Project 2025.

What's more nefarious than age-verification? The chilling effect on platforms. The threat of prosecution is likely enough to get a lot of retailers to end sales of politically "harmful" categories entirely. No more fantasy, no more sex education, no more LGBTQ+ resources. That's the real goal.