I dread to even imagine Starmer's equivocating on this issue.
What's this? A PM who knows how to put the ball in the back of an open net?
Also almost practically guaranteed to get dementia
My instinct when someone says this shit is not 'you're so hardcore', it's 'you are not going to perform well'.
The obvious question is: did you vote against this unfunded policy decision at the cabinet table? And if not, why not.
Sacked ministers often say damn fool things, because they are feeling sad about being sacked and they’ve also lost their “don’t send that tweet boss” system too:
Not sure how these lovely words fits beside Mahmood staying where she is
"My parents came to Britain as Jewish refugees from the Nazis. To them, Britain was both a sanctuary and a beacon of hope in the global fight against fascism. I will carry my parents’ faith in that spirit of Britain to my role representing our country" - Ed Miliband on his appointment as Foreign Sec
Might be naive, but it's good to have a semblance of hope again.
Burnham is radical on devolution, public ownership and electoral reform. He has appointed serious people with proven track records. He is charismatic, has real emotional presence, and a proven appeal to voters. Why wouldn’t a progressive be excited? open.substack.com/pub/arguably...
25 AD and Jesus Christ is mainlining creatine and doing Bulgarian spilt squats
Pastor Martin Sedra fumes that "America has created this gay version of Jesus Christ": "Jesus was not effeminate. Jesus was a bold lion. I always tell people Jesus was not a soft guy. He had six packs. He was the most ripped guy you'll ever meet."