Sara Reardon

@sarareardon.bsky.social

Reporter at Science covering biology, policy, and all things wild and wonderful. @science.org‬ 🧠 🧬 ⚖️ 🐒 🏳️‍🌈 🦠 🔬 🏛 👩‍🔬 Signal: sara_reardon.59

🚨Breaking🚨: NIH is terminating health disparities research grants again. This time, they may successfully avoid legal challenges by giving specific reasons for their decisions. One grant so far, more to come. Exclusive @science.org by me and @jocelynkaiser.bsky.social www.science.org/content/arti...

NIH is again terminating grants that the Trump administration dislikes

With cancellation of health disparities project, agency may be testing new way to legally kill politically sensitive grants

science.org

🚨 Update🚨 : I'm thrilled to be starting as a fulltime reporter at Science! I'll be covering biomedical research and science policy from Boston. Please send me tips about science, scandals, and cephalopods. 🧬

"Have we no shame?” District judge William Young ruled that NIH must restore some cancelled grants, then berated the administration for the racial and gender discrimination behind the terminations. Now we wait for his full ruling -- and a likely appeal. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

Judge orders NIH to restore hundreds of grants cut under Trump

William Young calls terminations illegal, berates agency for discrimination

science.org

"We spent all this money on this research and we’re not even going to be able to give taxpayers the outcomes." DOGE's cuts to NIH grants may save money on paper, but terminating studies without notice ultimately wastes money, our analysis shows. @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...

Are terminations of NIH grants wasting billions of taxpayer dollars?

DOGE argues killing grants saves money, but a Science analysis suggests more than $1.4 billion in sunk research costs may produce few results

science.org