Tessera

'Pag nagawa kong mapaghusayan pa at naabot ko na God-tier level, hu u ka sa'kin In English: If I manage to get so good and reach God-tier level, who are you to me (or you'll be a nobody to me)

I didn't expect it would get this long.. ooohh boy Read 4 screenshots, part 1 of 4 ABUSING and MISUSING this argument and abusing UTTER LACK OF SPECIFICITY AND CLARITY and Non-specific incomplete vague allusions and their overconfident dismissive assumptions bsky.app/profile/scha...

ABUSING and MISUSING this argument and abusing UTTER LACK OF SPECIFICITY AND CLARITY and Non-specific incomplete vague allusions and their overconfident dismissive assumptions and gross lack of context and the clarifications I made and also abusing seemingly detached impersonal impartiality and paralysis by analysis AS IF I am posing an absolute position for every single claim I made and not just I'm more sure or really convinced than usual based on my criteria for some partial but SIGNIFICANT aspect of his as reflected through his behaviour based on my longterm observations and evidence based on his treatment and views towards me and other people or I'm definitely sure for the generally harmful traits AS CONSIDERATIONS (Narcissistic Machiavellian Sadean dispositions (see **1) and utter lack of affective empathy which he confirmed) based on my contextual explanations that affect something that affect another that MASSIVELY CONTRIBUTE AND AFFECT how he forms his worldview, framing and perceptions of other people or everything else in a self-reinforcing and synergistic way (See **2) — because that's how I talked about them and NOT ULTIMATELY UNDENIABLY AS CAUSING some specific trait or action that he made that people imagined out of thin air and cannot stop begging the question and just immediately jumping to conclusions based on their possibilities.

If anything it's pointing much more to his longterm pattern and not necessarily towards a few single things he said about me.. that is why I kept bringing up HIS LONGTERM PATTERN AND HABITS and why I talked about that we should count that as evidence and not just a few isolated instances when people asked for credible thorough evidence. I don't think I even used the word "caused" until my very last post alongside those traits when I tried looking it up on Bluesky. I only mostly used "contribute" and that's a very modest reasonable claim. And it's as if this is to suggest both me... and religious apologists who argue from psychophysical harmony are making the exact claim of posing the same number of possibilities and angles we looked at this as like people's Gotcha moment‼️ instead of that I'm just bringing up general contributory synergistic correlations but still incredibly consequential harmful traits IN THE CONTEXT I BROUGHT THEM UP FOR AS A WAY TO TALK ABOUT THEM AND HIGHLIGHT THEM hence.. my choice of words... and that needs to be taken into consideration if he's going to keep making those incredibly harmful judgments and keep treating me so casually cruel FOR MORE THAN A YEAR NOW.

And it's as if bringing up a set of traits as a logical and evidential explanation that do contribute to my observations and the resulting behavior themselves would not count as an egregious explanation

would not count as an egregious explanation themselves for behavior that makes every thing so much worse than it already is in synergistic and self-reinforcing ways and what it would actually mean to have these traits that people won't even think twice and they're just completely conflating them with non-probable theistic causes that have non-probable consequences when it comes to other possible explanations. Narcissistic Machiavellian Sadean dispositions and utter lack of affective empathy, lack of imagination, foresight, problem-solving ~ More than anything.. it's quite bold to have to very superficially think as like a passing lazy thought that these traits are somehow just words that were made up and dreamed up and hallucinated by someone and got conveniently inserted into the narrative that don't actually seriously measure up to forming a whole person and a whole worldview.. and it's as if how these traits have already egregiously sabotaged his ability to relate with other people and see it from our perspective without merely having to call us as objects that somehow have similar external experiences as him and then treat us beneficially that would also suit his longterm goals would not count as evidence themselves just because he managed to excel in other areas (like also probably improving his imagination, foresight and problem-solving) that come as a result from having

problem-solving) that come as a result from having these traits when that's not exactly what I've been arguing for and wanting to bring up to his attention that is already affecting his relationship with me that also heavily negatively impacts or self-reinforces his lack of imagination, foresight and problem-solving in this vein.

Why are people struggling to understand.. or at least get what I've tried to explicitly communicate or why are people struggling to focus on the things I communicated?? Why are we conflating things in our minds all the time?? We NEED to be much more specific and clear with our reasoning because this will only keep happening after almost a month's worth of communication if people have their thoughts in chaotic confused shambles, I'm sorry.

Especially that the same people are oh so confident and appearing at times (or a lot of times) to be condescending based on their imagined possibilities

I mean it's okay to misunderstand something or be wrong and confused with your original interpretations once or twice if you are the charitable curious type.. and I would also understand if people have less obvious blind spots as we all do.. but after several attempts of communication and clarification weeks later and

I'm back "Indeed; rather, blessed are those who comprehend that the psychophysical harmony argument is Banana Argument 2.0" substack.com/@stanpatton/...

Indeed; rather, blessed are those who comprehend that the psychophysical harmony argument is Banana Argument 2.0

notice how gracefully it sits over the human band

God is not the Riddler. I'm confident he did not create this world to test how good people are at sifting through logical and mathematical arguments. Christ never says 'blessed are the Bayesians and those who comprehend the implications of psycho-physical harmony'

Read 4 screenshots, part 1 of 3 People say you can't be "overconfident" about something to mean something apparently unwise and almost intrinsically inseparable with smugness, arrogance and complacency. It's quite silly and convenient to have to say that bsky.app/profile/scha...

People say you can't be "overconfident" about something to mean something apparently unwise and almost intrinsically inseparable with smugness, arrogance and complacency. It's quite silly and convenient to have to say that as if you can just generalize that for every single thing that vaguely resembles what it would actually mean if you have emotional psychological investment in something and you sussed out a pattern attentively for a long time.. and you actually took the time to get to know a person for quite a long time from different angles much more than the people who are just reacting and taking the piss on someone from just having learned something and committing the sin of having to air out a bunch of their bold presumptions and conjecture about me and the things that I know that they don't and my methods how I came to my opinion (which they would never mention of course and it would be a huge empirical oversight from their part and it signals their OVERCONFIDENCE in their own interpretations and conclusions about me, Joe and everything else)... Of course you would have a higher degree of confidence! And you would probably be right to do so. Of course you were hurt and felt insulted and again made to feel the unpleasant thing like you're not enough and of course your emotiveness and your usage of words would inevitably reflect your psychological mental state as it's rightly distressed and it's ruthlessly being badgered again. Unless

and it's ruthlessly being badgered again. Unless people just want to act as if assuming intellectual detachment and a level of undeterred chill demeanor to their colleagues and to prove to themselves somehow never places them in situations that would probably make them similarly much more emotional, or even full of uncertainty or even become convinced of something in a very unhelpful unhealthy way. People have an unusual familiar relationship with cliché stereotypical views that LACKS CRUCIAL SPECIFICITY apart from their very apparent intellectual dishonesty and lack of self-awareness and curiosity and have a detached impersonal perspective on the matter you don't particularly care about in the same way and how it is actually affecting you and even your situation as it already is.

It's really amusing that people are much more invested with hyperfixating with my probabilities which I believe we don't even have the same definitions, implications and imagined possible scenarios and they really have to go to such great lengths to strawman me or deflect a talking point and perpetually repeat their original talking points and constantly talk past me to avoid having to be accountable and answerable for their own failings when the onus becomes something that is also apt to them.. It's because a lot of them don't have

to them.. It's because a lot of them don't have particularly good convincing thorough arguments or better ones I believe which are not just entirely selective in their reasoning and already about the things that I ALREADY KNOW AND I BROUGHT UP EARLY ON AND CLARIFIED about our subjectivity, pragmatic utility, emotive contextual language use and whatnot.. as well as the reason being one of challenge and provocation to unjust unimaginative characterizations and constant continual condescension and humiliation and very inadequately unchallenged blind spots.

It's really interesting that they are making it seem that they are only reserving the right for self-expression to your own perspectives to him and not to me when he's been continually insulting and putting me down.. and the reason why I say that is because they keep on bringing up subjectivity and cultural individual relativism as if I have not thought about that and brought that up adequately.. and it's as if talking about how I feel and think means I'm completely invalidating and disregarding what he thinks and feels that I also know and aware of.. and I actually took the time to understand and get acquainted, thus why I'm still defending, supplanting and steelmanning him sometimes. Or they didn't really fully understand what I'm trying to communicate as is already very apparent in their one-dimensional takes.

They really are hyperfixating on my probable statements about him so much more than they are bothered by Joe's pure judgment, vibes, condescension and the outright harm he's projected to me for a much longer time.. even from the get-go when I first brought this up.. not to mention they really are showing themselves to be much more concerned with appearing right and being incredibly dismissive.. and funnily enough as I would have already implied, never admitted and conceded any one of my critiques and the huge mistakes and fallacies they made. And making it look like being probably wrong about something like a goddamn reasoned thorough or evidenced opinion for crying out loud.. not just mere intuition and insubstantial lackluster arguments.. is the absolute worst thing that you can ever do from how they are making an intellectual mockery out of it.. more than their strawmanning and oversimplified caricatures of my arguments and utter lack of impartiality.. really now?? Just bad empirical attitude and conversationalists.. and very childish

Whatever happened to your response to me and what you said about Joe to taking the high road and being a much better illuminating guide and collaborator and much more efficient communicator to him?? Oh so now you just decided to switch tactics and take the meandering repetitive circularity of your framing when it's with me.. How unproductive

Responding to the restacker of this post and the other people bsky.app/profile/scha...

I'm back "Indeed; rather, blessed are those who comprehend that the psychophysical harmony argument is Banana Argument 2.0" substack.com/@stanpatton/...

Responding to the restacker of this post and the other people bsky.app/profile/scha...

In other news, I think there is the ongoing tendency to confuse posing an insight into necessity when someone is expressing themselves and clearly insulted, offended and hurt and affected. I'm not sure if this is just a habit that's perpetuated when people substack.com/@abbenmaguir...

One of the best treatments of Mary's Room ever, and the line about Philosophers Syndrome, the act of mistaking a failure of imagination for an insight into necessity, is one of the sharpest single "bars" (so to speak) of any post WWII analytic philosophy book ever written. Then there's the point about the spiral color illusion which is like a mind-blowing aha moment.

Gosh, maybe I should re-read it. I also think Dennett is an uncommonly fantastic writer, uncharacteristic for analytic philosophers, which helps his books go down smooth.

Scenario: Someone: *clearly insulted and hurt.. decides to vent about his family problems at a pub to a philosopher and refers to them as disrespectful and lacking in imagination and problem-solving*

Read 3 screenshots 👓👩🏻 Or other examples that may or may not interest us, how many of us ever really fact-check and corroborate each and every one of the ingredients that are in a nutrition label and their corresponding percentage and just assume them as a given?? bsky.app/profile/scha...

Or other examples that may or may not interest us, how many of us ever really fact-check and corroborate each and every one of the ingredients that are in a nutrition label and their corresponding percentage and just assume them as a given?? How many of us have ever really corroborated each and every single one of the claims that are in scholarly academic history books, autobiographical non-fiction works and all the scientific facts and theories of the world??

Now I'm sure we have complicated methodologies, and systematic approaches, not to mention the vast meta-evidence that we can use and refer to to verify the scientific facts of the world.. so do we have rigorous evidence gathering and analysis and the strict peer review process that need to be followed in order to bring together scholarly academic sources of information. I'm not saying we should give Appeal to Authority the undue justification and reliance that might not warrant it in every contextual situation, nor does probably deferring to one single individual really ideal when we haven't analyzed and reviewed for ourselves each and every one of their methods and their supposed evidence, claims or trends that they sussed out, but that sometimes, other than these situations, it might be necessary to just defer to a trusted legit authority (or even a lot of times we

trusted legit authority (or even a lot of times we tend to defer to our friends and strangers who we might not necessarily judge to be THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY based on our usage) for reasons that might be because it's certainly convenient, useful or necessary in the moment, not to mention it saves us a lot of time and the work of doing trial and error if we already found certain patterns or habits that work for us and tend to place us in safer or more conducive situations or ways of approaching things.

The justification that we need a rigorous demanding method for every single one of our beliefs and claims and specific points of discussion I believe is overstepping its bounds a lot of times to the point of needing to view these things with an absolute black-and-white mindset to make light of them in the most absolute black-and-white way of looking at them (not to mention we have such things as first principles and more intuitive notions about beauty and truth). And it doesn't even begin to reflect or account for every single facet of our lives or the way we live our lives and every single way we take in and use information and interact with other people and understand ourselves. I think this is certainly a fatal flaw in thinking that tends to seep into specific groups of our academic scholarly philosophy sphere where they tend to have such an allergic dismissive reaction and inaccurate misapprehension at the mere mention of specific points of view or ways of looking and approaching things outside the usual methods that they're already used to when it comes to "knowing something" or having a discussion.

I think what philosophers are missing is we need to be able to separate or distinguish the different ways and levels we can know something.

That said, I'm sure based on my criteria and also I would entertain certain possible moments that he is imagining and cognitively empathizing sometimes that would not win out as his pattern bsky.app/profile/scha...

Read 2 screenshots bsky.app/profile/scha...

And for what it's real worth and value, it might be wise, thorough and considerate for Joe and the other detractors and naysayers to also put their focus and attention to the "next explanatory level" so to speak, down the series or line of his causation of his attributes, habits, preferences and inclinations.. and not just MERELY focus and consider even through the reasoning that it's all downstream, foundational or underlying on his core inimitable traits where he was impacted and influenced early on by a variety of sociocultural factors and psychophysiological genetic factors self-reinforcing themselves.. if he keeps on condescending and belittling and hurting me, then don't blame me for having to point out that he is LACKING in imagination, foresight and problem-solving when he keeps framing things a certain way that is incredibly egocentric and surface-level and there is an utter lack of depth and substance with how he continually characterizes and talks about me that takes about as little time as possible in contrast to how I would perceive myself IN THE DETAILS AND NUANCES AND COMPLEXITIES and a few other things about other things we are not quite in agreement with.. that is because he refuses or is unable to think about them and imagine them and entertain them

as they are (other than HIMSELF and how these are all sifted eventually through his egocentric Me Me Me lens and how he alone feels and thinks for 95% of the time and his despair) that is also characteristic how a lot of other people lack imagination, foresight and problem-solving to begin with and the ability to truly know and feel for the other person.. which explains why he has this great tendency to often say I probably will eventually bore him to refer to my whole personality and that he will come to see me like everyone else as if to compare me to everyone else like for like and he continually talks about me as if I'm no one special who failed to meet his incredibly high standards

Continually referring back to some unbeknownst uncommunicated thing especially considering his communication and his patterns is just going to be an epistemic bind that doesn't lead to much more meaningful critique and assessments and even accurate ones

And for what it's real worth and value, it might be wise, thorough and considerate for Joe and the other detractors and naysayers to also put their focus and attention to the "next explanatory level" so to speak, down the series or line of his causation of his attributes bsky.app/profile/scha...

Read 4 screenshots He really doesn't seem to have an eye for details that would seem to other people even precious or loveable or specific to a person.. or at least human worthy of our attention and care.. and maybe it also has to do with their kind of people or subculture.

He really doesn't seem to have an eye for details that would seem to other people even precious or loveable or specific to a person.. or at least human worthy of our attention and care.. and maybe it also has to do with their kind of people or subculture. The way that other people would perceive who I'm sure he will condescend and judge and fail to fully appreciate because of maybe their immediate apparent attributes.. and their intellect and tastes he would often say.. I can relate with the people I have in mind as well who seems to care much more about these things the way that they tend to notice and even appreciate the little things about their beloved despite the differences and even during their moments of weakness and lack of ability and not necessarily judge them so harshly for it or make them feel that they're failing miserably at life and failing to meet my standards because there is always something to learn from other people despite the stage you are at intellectually and emotionally, even from those who are not quite like you.. not like the ones who hate and cringe at hearing anything that somewhat resembles expressing yourself this way.. especially when it's the inferiors who are doing this.

These people who "superior people" are so readily scornful and condescending towards have at least the normal understanding and likeability and level of vulnerability that comes with having to sit with another human being other than you being a less than ideal human being yourself.. and they might even possibly suss other people out when they're showing a tendency or idiosyncrasy from looking at it from different angles and layers and other possible explanations and ways of understanding that are likely to be incredibly helpful and insightful because they are not merely looking at it from the most stereotypical one-dimensional surface-level angle and interpretation that is characteristic of their utter lack of interest and care and myopicness when it comes to other people other than being crudely useful and worthy of them and their time for what purposes. They will not solely see you and measure you up from having grand exciting eventful narratives and romantic idealistic daydreams and subjecting you to a relentless test that can make or break your perception and idea of them easily despite being far from being a high value total catch yourself... but it is from the more grounded

catch yourself... but it is from the more grounded simple susceptible receptive sense when they notice things like the way he has certain mannerisms and tendencies, that time you remembered when he got quite nervous and quiet.. and preoccupied and lost in thought and then after some time later that evening he decided to open up about his family problems and insecurities, the type of songs that he loves listening to and how he is his most lighthearted childish self when he gushes talking about his favorite film or video game especially the particular moment you remember where he cried himself so hard after finishing a video game or film and he related at length his experience or review about this with you. Or the way you remember him and appreciate him from having a certain nuanced subtle thought process and mindset that can shoot into different directions and still be able to dig in having to entertain certain ideas that he is trying to figure out and piece together what it would mean to see it a certain way having to mesh it with his own way of viewing it and in what sense it would feel a certain way as for what purposes and what it would entail out of you.. or the way he has a deep sense of curiosity, fascination and vitality for a variety of things that is not just limited by the books and subjects he has known, read and studied that would not carry on its own to having a fluid understanding and way of seeing things outside these things

It's always sifted through his PURE JUDGMENT on his high horse if not already his own excessive self-consciousness. Funny how he considers himself a romantic but he can't even get himself to appreciate, imagine and romanticize the little things about what makes a person herself and an imperfect lived-in human being that points to her being much more uniquely individual and very real in a self-aware curious way and that's reflective of a phase and journey and she's not just pretending to be somebody else just to please you and give you half-baked short-sighted narratives and being the it girl you've been waiting for all along.

At least that's the type of romantic that I want who is not so obnoxiously offputingly naive, clueless and wretchedly self-absorbed

And also.. with that said.. can we just allow people to express themselves for a moment and stop overintellectualizing every little thing that doesn't really need overintellectualizing and especially at the moment they need it??

And we might also need to pay attention to the specific words which are being used to avoid jumping to conclusions and conflating things again in our mind

Like say when someone is putting out their dog ass incomplete review of a widely beloved critically acclaimed classic novel.. maybe.. just maybe they are missing and not imagining something crucial and evident that might be intrinsic or regularly patterned with them

And maybe it doesn't strike you as particularly noteworthy or interesting to redefine and restate things in ways that would reflect the many different ways that our ways of thinking diverge in the details and how that can express and make known clues as to what current predicament or emotional state

that person is trying to communicate to you in piecemeal ways, in more accurate ways that you can feel resounds their effort and you would have to be the one on the other side to piece it together and against all odds, appreciate and interpret it for the different rhythm

and the patterns how they are able to go about doing this. Sure, it will not be to your style and preference at all times.. but what is to your style and preference at all times that you were able to suss out and steelman their value regardless

I really SUSPECT (which means just because I haven't expounded on this word and elucidated with further examples of my suspicions, does not mean the word does not carry with its intended official definition and I don't mean it as it's officially intended)

Irischelle@schalazeal07.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Just to be clear if it's not already, I'm referring to Machiavellian Sadean tendencies and an utter lack of affective empathy(??).. people have to take that into consideration as a particular context that poses much more grave consequences on the individual bsky.app/profile/scha...

I just don't see when people imply that this would not affect your imagination and foresight and problem-solving skills in any way??

Thinking back how you tend to frame and interpret your grand philosophy and your ideas and yourself in relation to me and other people and so on.. being incredibly judgmental and terribly condescending and having overly simplistic immature self-defeating narratives through particular examples

Irischelle@schalazeal07.bsky.social · 2mo ago

That aside, I invite the humanists, altruists and moralizers and the natural curious learners to watch the video. It's very insightful and helpful to our aims.. if our goal is to get more out of our interactions bsky.app/profile/scha...

Seen I liked this because I watched it. That is all The War On The Humanities www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8GC...

Hey Bryan Johnson! I think this is an interesting video for me that might also interest you to some extent. You might want to check out Aubrey's feedback for you @ 29:03 that might help supplement the things Defying Aging: de Grey's Vision for Radical Longevity www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SPM...

Defying Aging: de Grey's Vision for Radical Longevity

YouTube video by Westcliff University

youtube.com

Maybe it needs to be reminded this way.. your extremely selfish self-serving philosophy is sort of analogous to saying what is the use of introspection when you can just grab it by the bum and watch her go flailing towards you.. leaving her husband. She's in on this too. She chose this..

Cheating in a relationship when there comes a point that I become bored and unhappy and she is not fulfilling my expectations to the tee, almost

Irischelle@schalazeal07.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I do think his utter lack of affective empathy and emotional bandwidth is contributing greatly to the deficiency in imagination and foresight and your downright fickleness in social interpersonal aspects, ON TOP OF THE THINGS THAT YOU COMMUNICATED AND I ALREADY KNOW. bsky.app/profile/scha...

It is your lack of foresight, imagination, problem-solving and patience in important areas that are also causing your misery or despair I think that really is the case

Take note that he also meant humanities to refer to me or him.. apart from its normal linguistic usage. Take what is useful. Steelman. Empathize. Imagine. Think outside the box. This will help us engage and relate with other people better who already disagree with us

@ Joe just a heads up, I'm probably gonna stop regularly following you and talking to you some time in the future. Prepare for the heartbreak

Don't know why Miles blocked me. Please unblock me as soon as you see this and I won't post unrelated indicting comments under your posts. Wish he messaged me first or just ignored my replies if it was bothering him or just deleted my comments like he did. substack.com/@mileskdonah...

Irischelle@schalazeal07.bsky.social · 3mo ago

This might probably be you. Please seek help with professional treatment and management. It might considerably help your situation. And please get an official diagnosis what particular disorder you have Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) bsky.app/profile/scha...

And also.. please PLEASE get help from a professional therapist and psychiatrist.. they might be able to provide you with additional valuable approaches and information.. even if that won't be able to address all the underlying.. or the covert main sources of shame and nihilistic feelings

People act and talk about the hurt they caused as if it's nothing and it's all just for fun.. shits and giggles.. they just had nothing better to do... and ACTUALLY you just need to be chill about it. I've had enough of you

@rayasianboy_ @kole404_ Watch: www.instagram.com/reel/DaKMtr8...

Read Substack post now and educate yourself (even when I literally talked about mental illness numerous times)

Even if some of these people might appear to be okay or nice people on the surface level or on first contact when the situation is not as uncomfortable or difficult or challenging