Stephanie Eller

@seller11.bsky.social

I ‘answer to "Hi!" or to any loud cry, Such as "Fry me!" or "Fritter my wig!" To "What-you-may-call-um!" or "What-was-his-name!" But especially "Thing-um-a-jig!”’

My latest @msnowreports.bsky.social piece on Vance/Oz’s claim of widespread fraudulent marketplace enrollment. Some brokers are to blame but regulation not disenrollment is the cure, and using absence of filed claims as evidence of fraud shows no understanding of insurance www.ms.now/opinion/vanc...

Opinion | You should be skeptical of JD Vance’s claims about Obamacare fraud

The vice president's anti-fraud task force may strip health coverage from people who did nothing wrong.

ms.now

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly granted a 14-day temporary restraining order, finding the news organizations are likely to succeed on their claim that their hard passes were revoked without constitutionally adequate due process. 2/

🚨 BREAKING: A federal judge has ordered the White House to IMMEDIATELY restore the press credentials of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO reporters after President Trump barred the outlets from the White House. 1/

Screenshot of page 8 of a September 24, 2026 federal court order signed by U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly. The order grants the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and directs White House officials, excluding President Trump, to immediately restore the “hard pass” press credentials of employees of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO that were revoked around September 18, 2026. The temporary restraining order remains in effect for 14 days. The plaintiffs are also ordered to post a $1 bond by October 1, 2026. The page ends with “SO ORDERED,” Judge Kelly’s signature, title, and the date September 24, 2026.

Indiana prosecutors charged five Indianapolis police officers, accusing them of misusing their access to Flock license-plate-reader cameras, after outreach from The Post highlighted thousands of questionable searches and led to an officer's suspension.

Five Indianapolis officers charged following The Post’s reporting on Flock misuse

The officers are among at least 100 police department employees accused of abusing their access to the camera system, prompting calls for greater oversight.

washingtonpost.com

yeah, i wrote a piece on this. i've been studying regional oil/gas markets a lot this year and that doesn't surprise me. because of the way pipelines work there kind of isn't really a "US" oil market. highly regionalized.

This is a common lie from DHS press flacks. They claim that people who came through CBP One — who registered for an appointment through a government app, went to a port of entry, and were issued a grant of humanitarian parole by a CBP officer letting them enter — "entered illegally." Total nonsense.

Aaron Hall@immlawachall.bsky.social · 2d ago

They can't help themselves. They lie by saying he "entered illegally." He entered with DHS permission under the CBP One program. Literally waited for an appointment to become available and entered with his appointment exactly as the U.S. government told him he should.

CLAIM: This illegal alien is here legally.

FACT: This is false. This person is in the U.S. illegally. He entered illegally under the Biden Administration. The illegal alien had no valid work permit, had no protective status, and had a final order of removal from a Department of Justice (DOJ) Immigration Judge.

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted.... History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” ― George Orwell, 1984

Bild

CMS head Mehmet Oz is leading the enforcement to fully terminate health plans of 760,000 individuals on the premise they fraudulently signed up for Obamacare. Sick or not, they're now fully uninsured. Oz, a "doctor," is sworn to to do no harm - Which makes him either a fraud or a criminal.

Senate Democrats are again insisting that administration officials release the contracts they negotiated with more than two dozen pharmaceutical companies to lower drug prices. The Post has published portions of the contracts with Pfizer and Eli Lilly:

Democrats again demand Trump’s drug-price contracts following Post report

Lawmakers say they cannot judge the effectiveness of the administration’s initiative to lower drug prices until the contracts are released.

washingtonpost.com

Dr Oz: "There are 5 times more people in parts of Obamacare in Florida than live in the state. It's impossible More than a third of people on Obamacare have never used the insurance policy once. If you were gonna pay your hard-earned money to buy insurance, would you ever use it? The answer is yes"

Note that the judge assumed here, for sake of argument, that Passantino was a *private* figure—not public—so there was no need for Passantino to prove “actual malice." Even so, Passantino couldn’t show simple negligence, because Weissmann's interpretation of the testimony was "reasonable."

Even assuming the truth of Mr. Passantino’s pleadings,
Mr. Weissmann “had reasonable grounds for believing that [his] communication was true.”
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 580B cmt. g.
Lest there be any doubt, a reasonable person attempting to verify Mr. Weissman’s
statements would have found ample sources of support. Representative Lofgren told the public at
a highly publicized congressional hearing that the Select Committee had “obtained evidence” that
“one lawyer told a witness the witness could in certain circumstances tell the Committee that she
didn’t recall facts when she actually did recall them.
” Business Meeting to Consider the Select
Committee’s Final Report; Select Comm. to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol
(December 19, 2022), 117th Cong., 2d Sess., at 8 (2022). And numerous mainstream media
outlets promptly identified Mr. Passantino as the lawyer in question. See supra p. 5.
Mr. Passantino argues that there is “no record evidence that [Mr. Weissmann] actually viewed or
otherwise knew of these media articles.” ECF No. 50, at 18. Nevertheless,
Representative Lofgren’s statement and the public reporting on it reflect and support the objective
reasonableness of Mr. Weissman’s statement because large swaths of people, including reporters
held to a higher standard of care, drew the same conclusions from the same testimony.

In 2023, atty Stefan Passantino sued @weissmann.substack.com for defamation for posting that Passantino had “coached” Cassidy Hutchinson “to lie.” Resounding victory for Weissmann yesterday on pleadings: “The transcript, far from contradicting Mr Weissman’s statement, supports it.”

Even assuming the truth of Mr. Passantino's pleadings, Mr. Weissmann "had reasonable grounds for believing that [his] communication was true."
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 580B cmt. g.
Lest there be any doubt,
a reasonable person attempting to verify Mr. Weissman's
statements would have found ample sources of support. Representative Lofgren told the public at
a highly publicized congressional hearing that the Select Committee had "obtained evidence" that
"one lawyer told a witness the witness could in certain circumstances tell the Committee that she
didn't recall facts when she actually did recall them." Business Meeting to Consider the Select
Committee's Final Report; Select Comm. to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol (December 19, 2022), 117th Cong., 2d Sess., at 8 (2022). And numerous mainstream media outlets promptly identified Mr. Passantino as the lawyer in question.
See supra p. S.
Mr. Passantino argues that there is "no record evidence that [Mr. Weissmann] actually viewed or
otherwise knew
of these
• media articles."
ECF No. 50, at 18.
Nevertheless,
Representative Lofgren's statement and the public reporting on it reflect and support the objective
reasonableness of Mr. Weissman's statement because large swaths of people, including reporters
held to a higher standard of care, drew the same conclusions from the same testimony.