The Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering

@sgdeliberation.bsky.social

The Alliance for Just Deliberation on Solar Geoengineering seeks to elevate voices of climate vulnerable communities in solar geoengineering decision-making.

SRM is on the agenda at this week’s Arctic Circle Assembly. As discussions begin, a new paper co-authored by DSG’s Clara Botto examines what responsible geoengineering research in the Arctic requires - including meaningful dialogue with and respect for Arctic communities. bit.ly/4rVvQ2k

Geoengineering to save the Arctic?

Geoengineering efforts often target the Arctic due to its crucial role in the global climate system. However, geoengineering is highly controversial in scientific communities and society. Here we offe...

bit.ly

Justice is a principle DSG incorporates throughout our work. It is often at the center of conversations we have with communities engaging with solar geoengineering for the first time. We are happy to have this work mentioned in this recent, important article in PLOS Climate: bit.ly/4xTbmZt

Mapping justice claims for solar geoengineering

Solar geoengineering is a set of controversial emerging technologies that seek to cool the planet by reflecting sunlight. These technologies may be able to reduce the worst impacts of climate change b...

bit.ly

Should community engagement be understood as infrastructure rather than an activity? Two of DSG’s Directors reflect on experiences they’ve had in the last few months that inform their thinking on community engagement, leaving them with six principles to share. Read them here: bit.ly/4xIW3Dl

Community Engagement in Solar Radiation Modification: Lessons from Two Models

Should community engagement be understood as infrastructure rather than an activity? DSG’s Whitney Peterson and Hassaan Sipra reflect on contrasting experiences they’ve had in the last few months that...

bit.ly

DSG's Director of Strategy and Comms, Whitney Peterson, reflects on what a cross-sector dialogue on governance readiness revealed: many of the challenges facing emerging technologies are shared across fields, and some of the best lessons come from looking beyond our own. Read more: bit.ly/4aRuoXI

Readiness Is Not a Destination: Lessons from a Cross-Sector Dialogue

A cross-sector dialogue explored how institutions build readiness under uncertainty, revealing shared governance challenges across emerging technologies and highlighting practical lessons for strength...

bit.ly

🌐 Apply Now: The latest Request for Proposals from @exeter.ac.uk and @aria-research.bsky.social, Understanding the potential impacts of Solar Radiation Modification on Sub-Saharan Africa, is live. Research institutions may apply for up to £70,000 in grants. Learn more: bit.ly/3SECHju

Understanding the potential impacts of SRM on Sub-Saharan Africa

Understanding the potential impacts of SRM on Sub-Saharan Africa. A request for funding proposals.

bit.ly

Sofia Kabbej, one of DSG’s Fellows, explains why solar geoengineering’s framing as a “climate security tool” is deeply political. She finds that actors throughout the field approach it from different security lenses: ecological, human, national, international. Read the analysis: bit.ly/4esTcrl

SRM as a Tool for Climate Security: Competitive Framing and its (Geo)Political Implications

Climate change is increasingly framed as a security issue by actors ranging from defense institutions to international organizations and academic communities. Yet, rather than producing a unified unde...

bit.ly

Stardust recently released a set of preprints alongside a new website. We've been asked, more than once, what we make of it. The form matters as much as the content, and this reads as a product launch rather than a contribution offered up for scrutiny. Our longer answer below: bit.ly/4ugPe9L

Reading the Signals: Stardust and the Shape of an Emerging Field

A lot has already been said about Stardust, across media, within SRM research community, and among people thinking seriously about what the future of climate governance might look like. We wanted to t...

bit.ly

“Where has the scientific merit review and the transparent public review process been for the last two years for this alleged particle? This idea of intellectual property with (SRM) is massively problematic.” @sktalati.bsky.social weighs in on the latest announcement from Stardust: bit.ly/4wvO9gG

Can Some Very Tiny Particles Cool the Planet? One Tech Company Says Yes.

Stardust Solutions says its tiny spheres can reflect the sun’s rays without harming people or the environment. Critics say private companies have no business altering Earth’s atmosphere.

bit.ly

Two new U.S. policy reports frame solar geoengineering as a national security battleground with China. An op-ed from @sktalati.bsky.social and @erinsikorsky.bsky.social argues that this narrative moves the conversation in the wrong direction.

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org · 6mo ago

@erinsikorsky.bsky.social and Shuchi Talati explains why viewing climate intervention technologies, like solar radiation modification, through the lens of security rhetoric alone is likely to poison the international environment that research and governance must take place.