Sebastián

@smancha.bsky.social

Tejano doing cognitive neuro(linguistics|science) at the University of Maryland

Excited to share our new paper in Cerebral Cortex (w/ Ellen Lau)! In this MEG study on visual working memory (VWM), we showed that uni- and multi-variate signals complementarily track different aspects of VWM representations across different regions. academic.oup.com/cercor/artic...

Complementary univariate and multivariate signals in the parietal cortex for visual working memory pointers and features

Abstract. An emerging body of work in visual working memory (VWM) has embraced the theoretical construct of pointers: an object is mentally represented by

academic.oup.com

Does anyone know if there are good published numbers on (American) English verb biases for alternating ditransitives? I.e. “give” is DO 8/10 times vs “toss” is PO 9/10 times. Either experimental norms or corpus derived

New paper in #ScienceAdvances! 10 ECoG patients performed 3 language production tasks: word, word list, and sentence production. We found surprising dissociations between how active cortical sites were and whether they encoded linguistic information: 🧵 [1/9] doi.org/10.1126/scia... @science.org

Hybrid spatial organization and evidence for magnitude-independent neural coding of linguistic information during sentence production

Brain recordings during speech reveal complex linguistic information throughout cortex, independent of neural activity levels.

doi.org

Quantifiers could be associated with different algorithms/hyperintensions from person to person, even if they all agree on truth conditions. Are they, in fact, variant in that way? We find evidence for “no! Everyone represents them the same!” Preprint here: ssrn.com/abstract=719...

Individual differences reveal underlying similarities in meaning: quantifier-dependent choices in verification procedure are consistent across individuals

Previous literature has investigated how quantificational sentences like 'Most of the dots are blue' are understood, using visual tasks which force pa

ssrn.com

What’s the sociolinguistics of the pronunciation of “pecan”? Even within Texas it seems like it’s in crazy variation across people, regions, and phrases

One fact I’ve seen no one appreciate about World Cup commentating is that even the North American English speaking commentators use British style collective plural agreement. “England are regrouping” etc

I should get paid to translate back and forth between classic symbolicist cog sci and Bayesian cog sci. “Agents infer latent causes with evidence from the sensory stream” = people guess what’s going on using abstract representations

This is likely predictable since it’s kinda my niche now, but I find it genuinely shocking that psycholinguists mostly gave up on studying sentence recall and recognition circa 1990 when there were and still are 10000 open questions

We wrote a thing -- showing you don't need LLMs to model language production dynamics like the tendency for speakers to reduce predictable words. All you have to do is better model how speech rate varies depending on where a word is and how long the utterance is. arxiv.org/abs/2512.23659

Less is more: Probabilistic reduction is best explained by small-scale predictability measures

The primary research questions of this paper center on defining the amount of context that is necessary and/or appropriate when investigating the relationship between language model probabilities and ...

arxiv.org

Almost done grading for the course I (designed! and) taught this semester on connections between verbal working memory, sentence memory, and sentence production. I always thought it was just a cheesy thing to say, but you really do learn more from the students than you teach them

If anyone is around for SNL down the block from me, I have a sandbox poster on Sunday! I present some very preliminary data examining cued sentence recall with MEG. If you care about sentence recall, MEG sentence production, or combining psycholing with memory tasks, stop by poster E19!

Coming up with ever more fucked up theories of syntax phonology semantics to believe, like Tree Adjoining Grammar, Harmonic Serialism, Usage Based Cognitive Semantics

I thought of a really annoying generativist thing to say when someone asks you about doing cross-linguistic studies: well, if you take I-language seriously then nearly every study is “cross-linguistic”