Sonja Drimmer

@sonjadrimmer.bsky.social

W. Ford Schumann Distinguished Visiting Professor in Democratic Studies, Williams College, 2026–2027. Assoc. Professor ArtHist, UMass Amherst. Impressive Politics: Print before the Press in Late Medieval England (UPenn, frthcmng). https://sonjadrimmer.com/

Quoting s'thing @cnygren.bsky.social & I are publishing soon: "the literacy argument is being made in advance of its necessity...it presumes a state in which those who are “AI illiterate” are disempowered, precisely in order to make an argument in favor of compulsory indoctrination in its use."

Hypervisible @hypervisible.blacksky.app · 38m ago

“If it's this embedded in the world, then it needs to be embedded in the learning and in the coursework…”

If there is one way to make one's self the Main Character of academic Bsky for the day, it is definitely to proclaim loudly that mashing facts in the AI fact blender is a "gamer changer" for historical research.

Everyone, I just met a young girl named Lilly. She was bored so I gave her paper and my pencil and in return she drew a portrait of me, which, I think we can all agree, is uncanny in its verisimilitude.

A piece of graphing paper with a pencil drawing of me as a large triangle with my arms up and very active strokes standing. For my dark hair and bangs.

The success of the AI industry amounts to the degradation of people’s lives, but the thirst among our representatives for this industry to succeed in that mission is intense. There is no shared prosperity here.

Elizabeth Warren@warren.senate.gov · 2d ago

Do you use Instagram or Gmail? You could be helping to train AI. Big Tech has turned what all of us helped create into a trillion-dollar industry. It’s time to tax AI so you can share in its success.

It requires expertise to be able to say, “I do not know the answer to that question, and that is becauae thus far scholarly consensus is that we do not have the knowledge needed at this time to answer that question.” Sometimes “I don’t know” is a far more rigorous answer than people might think.

This nonsense about the printing press and universities is simply a different form of the "the Church enforced thought control in the Middle Ages" canard and says quite a bit more about what the speaker thinks about modern institutional surveillance and control than about history.

Sonja Drimmer@sonjadrimmer.bsky.social · 3d ago

I’ve seen in two culture /higher ed magazines recently the claim that the printing press engendered a crisis of authority at universities bc anyone could publish what they wanted and people could learn things without universities. This is not true.

I’ve seen in two culture /higher ed magazines recently the claim that the printing press engendered a crisis of authority at universities bc anyone could publish what they wanted and people could learn things without universities. This is not true.

It’s almost as it never works to tell people to use “critically” or “with caution” a given technology known to fail for particular uses. One might suggest making the company itself responsible for refusing to give directions in certain conditions.

"This is not the first time we've gone and done a Google Maps rescue," Maria Masiar, the search manager of the Lions Bay Search and Rescue, said. "This has happened to almost every search and rescue team in the corridor."
A Google spokeswoman wrote in an email that their app is designed for streets.
"We encourage hikers to use trail maps and apps designed specifically for hiking," the spokeswoman wrote.
The New York Times@nytimes.com · 4d ago

Three teenage boys printed directions for a hike on a trail in British Columbia, Canada that Google Maps estimated to be over five hours. In reality, their hike weeks ago lasted at least 12 hours and required the intervention of rescue crews, according to the Lions Bay Search and Rescue team.

My favorite research success story, the moral of which is: always be nosey. I am writing on a subject on which everyone cites a prize-winning MA thesis that seems to be *un-gettable.* I contacted the archivist at the university where the thesis was written, and they got nothing. 1/6

First, this is fantastic. Second, it gives the lie to the idea that people need to “learn” how to use AI given that it’s become compulsory. What lurks behind the notion that people need tutorials in it is that AI “education” is just a how-to in avoiding its hazards. The real education is this ⬇️

jessamyn@librarian.bsky.social · 5d ago

I work at a public library. People who want to use AI seem to have no trouble doing so. People who don't want to use AI have a harder time. I crowdsourced and then finalized this document "How to disable or avoid intrusive AI" and then gave it a short URL: notoai.org Please pass along if it's useful

An aircraft passenger oxygen mask: a drop down passenger mask with air bag and yellow plastic mouth and nose cover, oxygen tube has been cut; Demonstration model used by flight attendant crew for passenger instruction. Has text on the side indicating that it's non-functional.

We messed up! During a segment earlier this week about the risks of artificial intelligence, we shared a quote purportedly by author Naomi Klein that was itself AI-generated. She joined us on today's program to discuss the viral spread of the words falsely attributed to her.

"Democratizing art" are we now? “Now this isn’t just an artwork that exists several centuries ago that’s stiff and unapproachable, but it’s talking to me in an accent and I can ask it questions...Related to that idea is more broadly this idea of democratizing art.” www.artnews.com/art-news/new...

Harvard Art Museums Tested Out Using Generative AI to Animate 18th-Century Painting as Part of Marketing Campaign

The Harvard Art Museums recently tested out using generative AI to animate a 1750 painting by François Boucher as part of a marketing campaign.

artnews.com

One nice thing I've done over the last two years is get print subscriptions to a bunch of excellent culture and politics periodicals. I tend to think that that is where the absolute best writing is happening these days.

If what I’ve been reading lately is indicative, “chain of custody” is going to be the anti-AI phrase of resistance for the next year or so. I think it’s good, or haven’t been convinced of why it’s bad. Lends legal credibility to a range of related forms of objection as to why AI cannot be trusted.