satya

@soundsagreeable.bsky.social

"the truth which conceals that there is none"

What this means is not that we should carve out 'exceptions' for 'good AI' and sit back - but rather it means protecting whatever narrow, specific actually-useful applications exist actually involves being aggressively anti-gen-AI and anti-hype, and anti-enslopification bsky.app/profile/keta...

Ketan Joshi@ketanjoshi.co · 3mo ago

Every single AI thing that I leave the door open a crack for the possibility that it might end up net-useful, it just ends up stunningly bad. Text-to-speech and speech-to-text should have both just been breezy wins? How are *ALL* the apps in both of those fields just raw garbage?

A reminder that these interactive cards exist and are free to use. Visit them in your web browser, and click to open 3 random cards in your next sprint planning, retro or strategy meeting. Conversations to promote others' wellbeing boost your own, your team's and your organization's wellbeing.

Axbom's Playing Cards

Axbom's cards provides you with collections of topics, challenges and exercises to support better decision-making in digital development. Use these interactive card decks for free in work meetings and...

cards.axbom.com

what an absolute twisted po💩 this Vik Bajaj of FK AMZN's Prometheus "AI" is, to frame it so poisonously: “The reason is not that people are Luddites…it’s much like the protests against the masks in Covid. It has become a political symbol" Indian Uncles keep proving their commitment to billionaire 🍆

David Gerard@davidgerard.circumstances.run.ap.brid.gy · 3d ago

Data centre developers shocked that nobody likes them lol eat shit https://www.ft.com/content/32fd4450-5880-437d-9bd9-df13289ada24 archive https://archive.ph/cZsU6

They are all in. They intentionally degraded a product that was widely understood as synonymous with search. It’s like if Kleenex decided tissues should be replaced with sandpaper and then they tried to force everyone to use it.

there are a number of you, yes you, who have lost my respect because you openly talk about using genai in your “work” or “as part of your workflow” — the latter has become one way folks are hand waving its use as benign. honestly? fuck you if you are an academic who uses genai.

Here's the video from the 5th class of my course, The Story of Capital. We discussed Chapter 8: The Production of Space, Time & Place. For our next class on October 27th we will discuss Chapter 9: Social Reproduction and the Circulation of Labour Power davidharvey.org/2026/10/the-...

The Story of Capital – Class 5

Figure 1: Circulation of Capital The course will run on Tuesdays from 4:15-6:15pm [ET] from September 8 – December 1, 2026. Register for the virtual course here. Readings for this class: …

davidharvey.org

There seems to be a confusion in some circles between small-models-for-languages such as Te Hiku Media's - which actually exist and need our solidarity - and 'small language models' (LLMs,chatbots) - which don't exist outside wishful thinking about community-powered AI.

What is the deal with hyper-degreed men willingly accepting Cognitive Decline from heavy "AI" use despite their own favourite authorities MITStanfordBerkeley publishing studies about it? They know very well it fries their brain, but nevertheless use it. Is it like a badge of honour?

This - //Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of science that centers human understanding.//

Dr Abeba Birhane@abeba.blacksky.app · 3w ago

"Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of science that centers human understanding." www.ahmath.org/statements

AHM Statement on OpenAI’s October 6 Release of Mathematical Documents

Yesterday, on October 6th, 2026, OpenAI – which is currently defending lawsuits against accusations of illegal plagiarism, copyright infringement, and trademark dilution – released a repository of manuscripts purporting to contain solutions to a number of high-profile problems in mathematics.

Mathematicians did not ask for this work to be done. The Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, from whom OpenAI has claimed to derive its legitimacy, opened their initial advisory statement by saying that frontier AI corporations should not test advanced mathematical problems on internal models. In ignoring the central premise of the Advisory Group’s position, OpenAI has indicated total disregard for the norms of scientific research — norms that guarantee that mathematics remains trustworthy, ethically researched, and in the public interest.

Mathematicians have a particular vision of progress that is informed by history and field-specific considerations. We reject OpenAI's assertion that this release advances our subject, and we urge mathematicians and the public to view the value of this publication model with due skepticism. 

Releasing over 700 files at once is not a demonstration of scholarship, but a demonstration of power. We urge mathematicians to discontinue their work with OpenAI and to return to a vision of science that centers human understanding.

Association for Human Mathematics
Communications Working Group

Announcing our critical philosophy of AI seminars for 2026-2027: ‘Yet Another Machine For Producing Gods’ cpct.uk/2026-2027/ Each week pits a philosophical text and a technical document against each other to interrogate presuppositions and provoke radical reflections.

2026/2027

‘Yet Another Machine For Producing Gods’ Image: UBahn station in Essen, Germany, artwork by anonymous students at the Hochschule der bildenden Künste, 2026 Time: Wednesdays, 4:00-6:00 p…

cpct.uk

I think part of the issue is critical AI folks get dismissed at the door if we don’t give any merit to potential benefits while boosters don’t have to do the same to skeptical ideas. It’s a double standard.