Stanford Law Review
@stanlrev.bsky.social
A legal publication run by @StanfordLaw.bsky.social students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary. stanfordlawreview.org
SLR's submission portal for publication in Volume 79 is now open! We look forward to reviewing your submissions. stanford-law-review.scholasticahq.com/for-authors
For Authors | Stanford Law Review
The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948. It is operated entirely by Stanford Law School students.
stanford-law-review.scholasticahq.com
Professor Maureen Brady’s recent piece in the Stanford Law Review Online was cited by Justice Barrett in her concurrence in today’s Supreme Court decision Wolford v. Lopez. Give it a read! www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/prope...
Property v. Guns: The Level-of-Generality Problem in <em>Wolford</em> | Stanford Law Review
In Wolford v. Lopez, the Supreme Court will examine whether states can require property owners to consent before armed individuals enter publicly-acce
stanfordlawreview.org
Wonderful to be in conversation with the brilliant @dahlialithwick.bsky.social on @slate.com's Amicus podcast discussing my forthcoming @stanlrev.bsky.social article on Black Conventions of the 1860s and how Black activism shaped the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen here: slate.com/podcasts/ami...
Justice Gorsuch’s Ode to Weed
Justice Gorsuch on the day-drinking habits of the founders and why your evening gummy is totally fine.
slate.com
Stanford Law Review’s summer submission cycle and our Scholastica submission portal will open on Friday, July 17, 2026, at 5 PM PDT. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!
Volume 78 is now complete! Read our complete Volume at www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/. Congratulations to the 52 outstanding Authors across Volume 78’s print and online journals, and thank you to Volume 78’s exceptional editors for their incredible dedication to the Stanford Law Review.
Volume 78’s final issue—Issue 6—is now live on our website! The Issue’s theme is APA at 80: What’s Next for Administrative Law?
Duncan Hosie argues in his Essay that Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence in Vasquez Perdomo incorrectly interprets precedent, employing “factual revisionism.” Read more about this theory and its implications for federal immigration enforcement here:
Factual Revisionism: Precedent Subversion and the “Kavanaugh Stop” | Stanford Law Review
In his Essay, Duncan Hosie identifies and theorizes “factual revisionism,” a method through which an appellate judge mischaracterizes a lower cour
review.law.stanford.edu
In her Essay, @maureenebrady.com posits the Supreme Court has a level-of-generality problem in cases like Wolford v. Lopez and Bruen. Brady argues courts should be transparent about how their choices reintroduce means-ends reasoning. Read more here: review.law.stanford.edu/online/prope...
Property v. Guns: The Level-of-Generality Problem in <em>Wolford</em> | Stanford Law Review
In Wolford v. Lopez, the Supreme Court will examine whether states can require property owners to consent before armed individuals enter publicly-acce
review.law.stanford.edu
Stanford Law Review Online is now accepting short essays for a special collection on Technology, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Civil Rights. We look forward to reviewing your submissions! stanford-law-review-online.scholasticahq.com/for-authors
For Authors | Stanford Law Review Online
Stanford Law Review Online supplements SLR's print editions with short (usually < 5,000 words) and timely pieces of legal scholarship.
stanford-law-review-online.scholasticahq.com
Stanford Law Review Online is seeking short essays for a special collection on Technology, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Civil Rights. Submissions open April 3-May 1, 2026. Scholars, practitioners, industry experts, and policymakers welcome! review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/u...
review.law.stanford.edu
On February 27 and 28, the Stanford Law Review will bring together scholars, practitioners, and judges to discuss the future of administrative law and seismic shifts in executive power. The Symposium is open to the public. To learn more and register, visit www.stanfordlawreview.org/symposium/v78/.
Thrilled that my article Private Governance and Originalism will be published in the Stanford Law Review @stanlrev.bsky.social! The article explains why private groups including schools, corps & other orgs create unique challenges (and opportunities) under originalist "history & tradition" tests
SLR's submission portal for publication in Volume 79 is now open! We look forward to reviewing your submissions. stanford-law-review.scholasticahq.com/for-authors
For Authors | Stanford Law Review
The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948. It is operated entirely by Stanford Law School students.
stanford-law-review.scholasticahq.com
SLRO will open for submissions on our website and Scholastica on Thursday, January 29, at 9:00 AM PT. Please see our website for more information. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!
Online Essay Submissions | Stanford Law Review
stanfordlawreview.org
Stanford Law Review’s winter submission cycle and our Scholastica submission portal will open on Monday, January 26, 2026 at 8 PM PST. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!
Expanding public-carry regimes challenge Terry’s reasonable-suspicion standard. In some states, suspected gun possession alone can’t justify stops. @ahochmanbloom.bsky.social warns an emerging “firearm exceptionalism” sustains racialized, hindsight-based policing.
The Emerging Firearms Hypocrisy of <em>Terry</em>: The Fifth Circuit in <em>United States v. Wilson</em> | Stanford Law Review
Terry v. Ohio’s flexible reasonable-suspicion rule is colliding with the post-Bruen expansion of public carry. In United States v. Wilson, the Fifth
stanfordlawreview.org
In this SLRO Essay, @fredhalbhuber.bsky.social traces the APA’s “set aside” instruction to 19th-century state codes where courts vacated orders universally—not just as to the parties—and shows that the APA inherits this tradition that authorizes universal vacatur.
A Remedy Inherited: State Law, Universal Vacatur, and the Meaning of “Set Aside” | Stanford Law Review
Introduction This past June, in a decision already heralded as marking a “landmark shift in administrative law,” the Supreme Court in Trump v. CA
stanfordlawreview.org
After Dobbs, the right to contraception appears uncertain—but in this SLRO essay, Deborah Tuerkheimer argues the greater threats lie beyond the Court. Funding cuts, parental and conscience-based claims, and misinformation are eroding access even as formal protections remain.
Threats to Contraception | Stanford Law Review
Many question the future of the right to contraception after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, but Deborah Tuerkheimer argues that the m
stanfordlawreview.org
In discussion with @theregreview.bsky.social, Matthew J. Sanders discusses his forthcoming SLR article on the “little-known but highly consequential” administrative-remand rule. Sanders will present his work as a part of SLR's 2026 Admin Law Symposium. www.theregreview.org/2025/09/21/s...
The Power of Procedure in Environmental Law | The Regulatory Review
Matthew J. Sanders explores the importance of procedure in the evolving environmental law landscape.
theregreview.org
SLRO will open for submissions on our website and Scholastica on Monday, September 15, at 5:00 PM PT. Please see our website for more information. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...
Online Essay Submissions | Stanford Law Review
review.law.stanford.edu
SLR Online Special Symposium Essays are now available on our website! We have 8 Essays about executive actions, constitutional boundaries, and the rule of law in Trump II. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/
Stanford Law Review Online | Stanford Law Review
stanfordlawreview.org
SLR’s summer submission cycle and our Scholastica portal open tomorrow, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT! We look forward to reviewing your submissions!
SLR’s summer submission cycle will open on Friday, July 18, at 5:00 PM PT. We will be accepting general submissions as well as submissions for our Symposium Issue—The APA at Eighty: What’s Next for Administrative Law? We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis!
Stanford Law Review Online is now accepting submissions for our Special Symposium through May 23. Please see the Online Essay Submissions page for more information and to submit your piece. We look forward to reviewing submissions on a rolling basis! review.law.stanford.edu/submissions/...
Online Essay Submissions | Stanford Law Review
review.law.stanford.edu