Steve Parks

@steveparks.me

Geeking out about writing, entrepreneurship, journalism, food, tech — or ideally a combination. European, living/writing in France & running a business in UK. https://www.steveparks.me

This is crazy. AI is a tool. It will be transformative, but it is just a tool. It can already sit under other portfolios. Imagine creating a Desktop Computer minister when that was transforming the workplace in the 90s, or a Browser Minister in the 00s, or a Smartphone minister in the 10s.

Zoë Crowther@zoecrowther.bsky.social · 2w ago

Kanishka Narayan is the first UK AI minister to attend Cabinet My interview with Narayan last autumn provides insight into his approach to the brief 🧵👇 (1/6)

Here's something I post from time to time. My answer to a reader who asked me: what could journalists do NOW to break with some of their more corrosive habits.

Bild

@edent.tel it was not always like that, and doesn't need to be. And certainly shouldn't be with quality outlets. Back in 90s I produced Robin Oakley and sourcing and fact-checking had to be absolutely solid or it didn't go on air. Now someone gets a random whatsapp and it's broadcast 5 mins later.

Remember this is a great chance to clean up your news feed: Look for any journalists who wrote pieces or tweets saying they had it on good authority that Mahmood would be chancellor, and mute the heck out of them. They are little more than WhatsApp gossipmongers, and we don’t need that.

I’m inclined to support Burnham. But if that tragedy of a Home Secretary remains in cabinet, let alone in a top post, I’m out. That will show such colossal lack of principle and judgement. I’ll tune out of the whole lot for however many years and vote Green or Lib Dem next time around

I see Labour MPs still announcing stuff on X, a platform specifically designed to make people hate them, 100% shaped to push them out of public life and which would ideally see many of them in prison. Funny old world.

I don't think we'll have anything like equality in politics until women are allowed to hold influential roles without having to assert themselves as being somehow "hardline" or "tough". It's so patronising and, fundamentally, sexist.

Wow. The Department for Education has just published new projections which estimate that the number of pupils in state-funded schools in England will plummet by more than 9% by 2031 amid falling birth rates And yet this issue receives probably 1,000th of the coverage the immigration debate receives

I should follow up to say, if we want to open our front doors for children to play, we should make (temporarily) closing streets to cars easier, we should ensure there are welcoming, playable spaces within (independent) walking distance, and we should make local walking and cycling routes safe.

Alison Stenning@alisonstenning.bsky.social · 3w ago

I'll go with Skenazy's headline - "If you want your kids to thrive this summer, don’t just turn off their phones – open your front door, too" - but not this: "the original experience blocker is fear". Blaming parental fear avoids big questions about cars, hostile public space, and austerity.

Surely this is just the Westminster rumour mill suffering heatstroke? If this did happen it would instantly show Burnham has the same failure of judgement as Starmer: "Let's focus on trying to make Reform happy" He would instantly lose my support on day 1

Fionna O’Leary@fascinatorfun.bsky.social · 3w ago

I understood from Burnham supporters is that he is politically far more astute than Starmer. If that is true then appointing Mahmoud as Chancellor is an astonishing faux paux. Quite apart from her utterly alienating record as Home Secretary www.theguardian.com/politics/202...