Jack Jones

@storiesfromjack.bsky.social

PhD student - protest law (legal geography of protest on highways). Former professional dancer.

Map making of the area outside Gate 1 of Lakenheath RAF where protesters were arrested for various offences including wilful obstruction of the highway. Quite fun work! Do you know what offences you might commit if standing/protesting in the various areas?

Bild

Access to waterways is likely similarly limited as access to the sea. There is no common law right of bathing and therefore dependent on foreshore landowner consent for access (see Blundell v Catterall 1821). 1/4 www.theguardian.com/environment/...

Almost 75% of England’s riverbanks ‘off limits’ to public, figures show

Campaigners urge government to introduce right of access to water, particularly as heatwaves become more common

theguardian.com

An interesting read. A central issue for me is thaylt there is no clear definition of terrorism itself for ECHR purposes. So states have both wide latitude in how they define it, and then in how they respond to their own definition - justified under the ECHR because it is 'terrorism'. A heady mix.

Verfassungsblog@verfassungsblog.de · 2mo ago

The Court of Appeal upholds the UK's ban on Palestine Action. ALAN GREENE, DANIELLA LOCK & COLIN MURRAY argue that the margin of appreciation granted to the Home Secretary leaves judicial oversight with little more than nominal force. verfassungsblog.de/palestine-ac...

Quote: “The Court creates an impression of judicial scrutiny, but one so lacking in substance as to embolden even more far reaching uses of executive powers in the future.”

Worth noting the new offence of concealing an identity is a strict liability one. Intention is irrelevant. If someone is wearing or using an item that conceals their identity in a designated area, the offence is made out. Applies to anyone in the area, regardless of whether they are a 'protester'.

Netpol@netpol.org · 3mo ago

Labour has passed its new Crime and Policing Act that includes several new anti-protest powers – and they are alarming. Read our explainer to find out more netpol.org/2026/05/08/e...

A protester in Trafalgar Square, wearing a brown jacket, holds a hand-made placard that reads "Fuck Your Ban (we will win and fuck you Shabana Mahood)". In the background are other protesters and a City of London Police officer

Turnout at local elections has always been abysmal, but has been decreasing in recent years. Last year was only 34%. If people dont want certain people representing them, they need to actually vote.

Difficult to see how this can amount to conspiracy to cause public nuisance given the target was not the public, and the protesters were not blocking the 'public' part of the road but outside the entrance to the gate. 1/2

Bild

Claims the police imposed conditions taking into consideration the 'cumulative impact' of the disruption. The regs that granted that power have since been held unlawful, so why were the conditions considered lawfully imposed? www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...

Prominent UK pro-Palestine activists guilty of breaching protest conditions

Campaigners call verdict on Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham ‘grotesque’ and part of attempt to ‘undermine civil liberties’

theguardian.com

Well that didnt last long. The idea that the police 'must' enforce the law is nonsense. Especially in a human rights framework. They are still open to conclude that arrest would be disproportionate in the circumstances.

Bild

I walked through Norwich city centre at the weekend and saw these vans parked in front of the market, in the middle of the street. I found their prescence intrusive and imposing. It changed how I felt walking through that space. But maybe thats just me.

Bild

The Lords passed Lord Walney's amendment to introduce a new designation - Extreme Criminal Protest Groups. If designated as such, it would become an offence to be a member, to promote them, fundraise, organise events for them, provide training. Though it would not an offence to express support. 1/7

Decison to proscribe Palestine Action unlawful due to two reasons: 1: The Home Sec had considered 'other factors' that were not consistent with her own policy, which is founded in the basis that not all orgs who meet the criteria for a terrorist org should be proscribed. 1/2

If police already have the power to consider cumulative disruption, why re-introduce the concept in the Crime and Policing Bill? Ss 12-14ZA POA 86 have never been judicially interpretted as allowing an officer to consider the actions of past/future protests. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...

Met using outdated powers to police pro-Palestine protests, say legal experts

Lawyers argue ‘cumulative disruption’ regulations were quashed in May and should therefore not be used

theguardian.com

Im looking for a flat to buy and Ive noticed that a majority of leasehold properties have only 85-100 years left on their lease, built in the 80s - early 00's with 125 yr terms they are now nearing the problem 80 yr boundary. 1/2

Aslyum reviews every 2.5 years is a sure fire way to increase admin pressure/costs for the Home Office. The result will be shoddy reviews, rushed through, as workers struggle under higher caseloads. With refugees being the ones who pay the price. www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c2...

Home secretary says asylum reforms will 'unite a divided country' as full plans published

Shabana Mahmood also threatens three African countries with visa bans ahead of her address to Parliament this afternoon.

bbc.co.uk