Dr. Taraleigh Davis

@tdunc17.bsky.social

Assistant Professor of Public Law/Am. Politics @bradleyu | Political Science Ph.D. @UWM | M.A. @UCF_SPSIA | Emergency Docket | she/her

It’s been a long time coming, but I am proud to announce that In the Shadows of the Emergency Docket: What Emergency Applications Teach Us About Supreme Court Procedure, Precedent, and Public Opinion is forthcoming from the University of Virginia Press!

I’m really excited to announce that last week I signed an advance contract with UVA Press for my book “In the Shadow of the Emergency Docket: Emergency Applications and the Evolution of Judicial Power” to appear in UVA Press’s book series Constitutionalism and Democracy!

Great read on the dissent - data contradicts Alito's claim granting emergency relief w/o gov’t response was “unprecedented” It only requests responses in 33% of cases & grants 46% of those. The Court granted relief w/o responses in 11% of emergency apps (16-21) Not unprecedented—just less common.

Steve Vladeck@stevevladeck.bsky.social · last yr.

Today’s “One First” takes a (very) deep dive into Justice Alito’s Saturday night dissent in the A.A.R.P. Alien Enemy Act case—and how it attempts to invent a series of procedural objections to the majority’s intervention that … simply don’t exist: www.stevevladeck.com/p/145-justic...

SCOTUS just overturned a TRO in Dept of Ed v. Ca - deciding it was actually a preliminary injunction in disguise. They also determined the Gov’t would likely succeed in showing the DC lacked jurisdiction to order payment under the APA. Respond. Wouldn’t suffer irreparable harm if TRO was stayed

Second and last case of the day Bondi v. Vanderstock - Gorsuch writes for 7-2 majority that the ATF’s rule regulating ghost guns is valid. Thomas and Alito dissent saying that the text of the Act doesn’t cover unfinished parts and that weapons parts kits aren’t “weapons” until assembled

Court issued 2 opinions this morning first in U.S. v Miller Justice Jackson writes in an 8-1 opinion that the trustee in the case can’t recover the money from the IRS. Gorsuch dissents saying the government can be sued because Congress removed their special protection in bankruptcy cases.

Fitting first post on this app! Y’all “I believe the study has the potential to add meaningfully to the literature on this topic, and so I am pleased to invite you to revise the manuscript along the lines suggested by the reviewers.” Aaaaaahhhh! My 1st solo R&R!