Thaddeus Mason Pope

@thaddeuspope.bsky.social

Law professor & bioethicist www.thaddeuspope.com

The Cheryl Hauser Effect: Story and Conversation about VSED

You are invited to a special gathering introducing The Cheryl Hauser Effect, a documentary now in its final stage of production. Come September 17, 2026 at The Lantern in Portland, Oregon. The film shares the story of Cheryl Hauser, a Minnesota woman who, after being diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, chose to face the end of her life on her own terms through VSED (Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking). At seventy-six, Cheryl became a thoughtful advocate for end-of-life autonomy, inspiring important conversations about dementia, caregiving, and personal choice. This special preview event offers an early look at The Cheryl Hauser Effect while the film is still in production. Through selected clips and conversation, we'll explore Cheryl's story and the impact this film hopes to make. During this special evening, you will: * View selected, never-before-seen clips from the documentary * Learn more about VSED and end-of-life options * Hear from those directly involved in the story and the work surrounding end-of-life autonomy A conversation will follow with: * Randi Ewing, Palliative Care Director, Eden Health * Dr. Stephanie Kaplan, Naturopathic Physician Specializing in End-of-Life Care * Dr. Pete Regan, First physician to prescribe under Oregon's Death with Dignity Act * Jamie Thrower, End-of-Life Doula and Grief Educator Join us for an evening of storytelling, education, and conversation as we share Cheryl's story and build support for the film's completion. Learn more at thecherylhausereffect.com

dlvr.it

The Cheryl Hauser Effect: Story and Conversation about VSED

You are invited to a special gathering introducing The Cheryl Hauser Effect, a documentary now in its final stage of production. Come September 17, 2026 at The Lantern in Portland, Oregon. The film shares the story of Cheryl Hauser, a Minnesota woman who, after being diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, chose to face the end of her life on her own terms through VSED (Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking). At seventy-six, Cheryl became a thoughtful advocate for end-of-life autonomy, inspiring important conversations about dementia, caregiving, and personal choice. This special preview event offers an early look at The Cheryl Hauser Effect while the film is still in production. Through selected clips and conversation, we'll explore Cheryl's story and the impact this film hopes to make. During this special evening, you will: * View selected, never-before-seen clips from the documentary * Learn more about VSED and end-of-life options * Hear from those directly involved in the story and the work surrounding end-of-life autonomy A conversation will follow with: * Randi Ewing, Palliative Care Director, Eden Health * Dr. Stephanie Kaplan, Naturopathic Physician Specializing in End-of-Life Care * Dr. Pete Regan, First physician to prescribe under Oregon's Death with Dignity Act * Jamie Thrower, End-of-Life Doula and Grief Educator Join us for an evening of storytelling, education, and conversation as we share Cheryl's story and build support for the film's completion. Learn more at thecherylhausereffect.com

dlvr.it

Minimal Comfort Feeding in Advanced Dementia: Attitudes of Hospice and Palliative Care Professional

Here is a Share Link for free access to our recent article "Minimal Comfort Feeding in Advanced Dementia: Attitudes of Hospice and Palliative Care Professional" in the Journal of Pain & Symptom Management.   Context. Minimal Comfort Feeding (MCF) is a new approach to providing nutrition and hydration to persons with advanced dementia who have previously indicated (or whose surrogate believes) they would not want to live with advanced dementia. The acceptability of MCF has not been studied. Objectives. To assess perceptions of hospice and palliative care (HPC) professionals toward MCF. Methods. This cross-sectional exploratory survey study of a convenience sample was conducted at a national conference of HPC professionals in February 2025. During a presentation on MCF’s definition and ethical basis, attendees engaged in audience response polling and an optional electronic survey. Descriptive results are presented. Results. Fifty-one people attended the presentation. Forty-five attendees (88%) participated in audience polling, and 22 (43%) participated in both polling and the survey. The mean age of survey respondents was 50 (standard deviation 9.58),19 (86%) identified as White, and 18 (82%) identified as women. Thirty-five of 42 respondents (83%) agreed or strongly agreed that MCF is an acceptable option for persons with advanced dementia (PWAD), and 93% (39/42) agreed or strongly agreed they would be comfortable discussing MCF with persons with early dementia or who are at risk for dementia as a potential future option. Sixty-nine percent (29/42) anticipated MCF would be somewhat or completely acceptable to families of PWAD, but respondents were divided regarding the ease of implementing MCF in clinical practice. Conclusion. While MCF was highly acceptable in this study, the sample size was small and the risk of bias was high. Further research is needed. 

dlvr.it

Minimal Comfort Feeding in Advanced Dementia: Attitudes of Hospice and Palliative Care Professional

Here is a Share Link for free access to our recent article "Minimal Comfort Feeding in Advanced Dementia: Attitudes of Hospice and Palliative Care Professional" in the Journal of Pain & Symptom Management.   Context. Minimal Comfort Feeding (MCF) is a new approach to providing nutrition and hydration to persons with advanced dementia who have previously indicated (or whose surrogate believes) they would not want to live with advanced dementia. The acceptability of MCF has not been studied. Objectives. To assess perceptions of hospice and palliative care (HPC) professionals toward MCF. Methods. This cross-sectional exploratory survey study of a convenience sample was conducted at a national conference of HPC professionals in February 2025. During a presentation on MCF’s definition and ethical basis, attendees engaged in audience response polling and an optional electronic survey. Descriptive results are presented. Results. Fifty-one people attended the presentation. Forty-five attendees (88%) participated in audience polling, and 22 (43%) participated in both polling and the survey. The mean age of survey respondents was 50 (standard deviation 9.58),19 (86%) identified as White, and 18 (82%) identified as women. Thirty-five of 42 respondents (83%) agreed or strongly agreed that MCF is an acceptable option for persons with advanced dementia (PWAD), and 93% (39/42) agreed or strongly agreed they would be comfortable discussing MCF with persons with early dementia or who are at risk for dementia as a potential future option. Sixty-nine percent (29/42) anticipated MCF would be somewhat or completely acceptable to families of PWAD, but respondents were divided regarding the ease of implementing MCF in clinical practice. Conclusion. While MCF was highly acceptable in this study, the sample size was small and the risk of bias was high. Further research is needed. 

dlvr.it

ASBH-St. Jude Bioethics Tournament 2026

ASBH has announced a new Bioethics Tournament at the 2026 Annual Conference, in partnership with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. This tournament will feature two teams in a debate style format on Friday, October 16, 4:00–5:15 PM ET.    The aim of the event is to bring together ethics professionals, trainees, and students with diverse interests and backgrounds in friendly competition. ASBH strongly encourages participation across the career spectrum from students, trainees, early career, and late career professionals.  ASBH is currently recruiting teams, case writers, and judges. Teams will have the opportunity to highlight their argumentation and speaking skills; case writers will have the opportunity to contribute fresh ideas for public engagement, and judges will have the opportunity to foster responsive and critical thinking while moderating a session.  Teams: ASBH is recruiting two teams. Teams may consist of 3-5 members and must include at least one student or trainee. The interest form includes a statement of commitment and space to include team structure. ASBH is accepting applications for entire teams and for individuals who wish to be placed on a team. If you are applying on behalf of a team, please include the credentials, role, and institution for all team members.  Case Writers: ASBH uis recruiting up to 4 case writers to write a one-page case and questions to be used in competition. Teams will receive cases in advance and use them to prepare their arguments for use in the tournament. The interest form includes a statement of commitment and a summary of your proposed case, including background and questions for team consideration.  Judges: ASBH is recruiting up to 3 judges to evaluate the session. As part of the application, judges will be asked to include relevant experience in ethics or in participation of similar events. 

dlvr.it

Minimal Comfort Feeding in Advanced Dementia: Attitudes of Hospice and Palliative Care Professional

Here is a Share Link for free access to our recent article "Minimal Comfort Feeding in Advanced Dementia: Attitudes of Hospice and Palliative Care Professional" in the Journal of Pain & Symptom Management.   Context. Minimal Comfort Feeding (MCF) is a new approach to providing nutrition and hydration to persons with advanced dementia who have previously indicated (or whose surrogate believes) they would not want to live with advanced dementia. The acceptability of MCF has not been studied. Objectives. To assess perceptions of hospice and palliative care (HPC) professionals toward MCF. Methods. This cross-sectional exploratory survey study of a convenience sample was conducted at a national conference of HPC professionals in February 2025. During a presentation on MCF’s definition and ethical basis, attendees engaged in audience response polling and an optional electronic survey. Descriptive results are presented. Results. Fifty-one people attended the presentation. Forty-five attendees (88%) participated in audience polling, and 22 (43%) participated in both polling and the survey. The mean age of survey respondents was 50 (standard deviation 9.58),19 (86%) identified as White, and 18 (82%) identified as women. Thirty-five of 42 respondents (83%) agreed or strongly agreed that MCF is an acceptable option for persons with advanced dementia (PWAD), and 93% (39/42) agreed or strongly agreed they would be comfortable discussing MCF with persons with early dementia or who are at risk for dementia as a potential future option. Sixty-nine percent (29/42) anticipated MCF would be somewhat or completely acceptable to families of PWAD, but respondents were divided regarding the ease of implementing MCF in clinical practice. Conclusion. While MCF was highly acceptable in this study, the sample size was small and the risk of bias was high. Further research is needed. 

dlvr.it

Texas Republicans Oppose Brain Death & TADA

Last month, the Texas Republicans voted on legislative agenda items, including on "life-affirming patient protection." This is a material expansion of opposition to dispute resolution of brain death and medical futility disputes. Here is the full text of proposal 163:   We call for the Texas Legislature to secure due process and the rights of vulnerable Texas patients by continuing to reform Chapter 166 of the Health and Safety Code (Texas Advance Directives Act) by: a) Repealing the unethical, unconstitutional, unprecedented, and anti-life 25-Day Rule in Section 166.046, Health and Safety Code, and replacing it with a truly life-affirming law that requires physicians to adhere to a patient’s or surrogate’s medical decision about life-sustaining treatment, and that provides for physicians who disagree with the patient’s decision to transfer the patient to another physician or facility that will honor the decision to continue life-sustaining treatment. b) Improving language that protects Texas patients with disabilities to clarify and strengthen that disability should not be a considered factor. c) Guaranteeing judicial review, ensuring the ability to appeal a hospital committee’s decision and provide impartial legal recourse over life and death medical decisions. d) Protecting patients' rights to opt out of the dangerous apnea test to declare brain death, receive an independent second opinion and to have their beliefs about brain death to be respected.

dlvr.it