Theo Honohan

@theohonohan.bsky.social

"The subtlest and most pervasive of all influences are those which create and maintain the repertory of stereotypes."

Referring to 35mm film projection in a darkened art gallery as a "high court" seems to mistake prestige for authority. It's corrupt to think of a court as defined by prestige! Art isn't one! But if you appeal to apparatus theory, I guess it's OK to assert that it makes the material weightier. (2017)

Emma Moore: We also discussed the image you wanted to produce, one that could not easily circulate or be manipulated online. As you mentioned earlier, the work could only be presented within a very controlled environment. Could you say more about why you chose to shoot the film on 35mm?

Luke Willis Thompson: I think the primary reason had to do with a connection between Diamond’s video, made in a moment of trauma, and the physicality of analogue film. In both instances, what is recorded becomes the only possible image. It never felt like I had the right to take a digital HD camera and record endless amounts of footage, as it always felt like a privilege to create Diamond’s portrait.

There’s a depth and brilliance to the medium of 35mm film that can evoke an emotional response, even in its most abstracted capturing of shadow and light. It would be easy to say it is the contrast of Diamond’s video, because it differs so dramatically in terms of pacing, resolution, and picture clarity, not to mention film grain versus pixilation. But mostly, in order to show up the consequence of Diamond’s video I wanted to work in cinema’s most canonical form; its high court.

You're telling me that for an ideal gas, the increase in entropy is calculated just by multiplying the fractional increase in volume by the fractional increase in temperature, to find the fractional increase in the size of the state space? But logs are used to turn this into an addition? Is that it?

"A knot is a potentially permanent overlay of threads pulled tight enough that the space has been eliminated and the thread intertwines with itself. One of Albers’ main interests was in restoring the space around the thread-lines so that the eye could follow the pathways of the strands."

"No rehang at Tate, even before its 2000 bifurcation into (the not mutually exclusive) Britain and Modern, has been without controversy." Critiques of this on a postcard, please. Is the technical jargon "mutually exclusive" being used correctly? Did Tate consist of a single museum until 2000?