Thomas Haase

@thhaase.bsky.social

Research Assistant @ SynoSys TU Dresden Interested in the Groups and Networks - M.Sc. Computational Social Science from Institute for Analytical Sociology (IAS) 🇸🇪. Check this out 👉🏻 https://thhaase.de/

The content of political disinformation is repetitive, not diverse. In a new preprint, we track fact-checked claims in politicians’ posts and mainstream news from 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇩🇪. We find that a few false claims make up a large share of disinformation. Some appear hundreds or even thousands of times. 🧵1/7

Multi-panel scatter plot showing when disinformation claims appeared in social media posts and news from 2017 to 2026. The top panels show Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States; the bottom panel shows U.S. news articles. Each dot represents posts or articles matched to a fact-checked disinformation claim. Larger and darker dots mean the same claim appeared more often. The largest dot is in the U.S. panel and represents 1,918 appearances of one claim. Dot colors show the policy issue, including health, immigration, macroeconomics, environment, energy, law and crime, government operations, and other topics. Dashed vertical lines mark general elections. The figure shows that disinformation is concentrated in a small number of repeatedly used claims, especially in the United States, and that some claims later appear in mainstream news. Arrows connect U.S. social media claims to matching U.S. news articles for the 10 claims most often found in news.

Good question! Focus on ideology, not the 'populist' discourse or style. The problem isn't 'populism', it's far-right racism and authoritarianism. In a nutshell, don't be anti-populist, be anti-fascist!

We should view Social Media as a systemic issue instead of a symptomatic one and tackle its root: Overcoming the commercial and exploitative logic we applied to digitalization so far. Making social media better and safer for eyeryone will be more sustainable for young people AND for democracy.

Wenn ich X öffne, kommt in der Regel als erstes immer so etwas. Genau deshalb haben Elon Musk und der Bruder von Joana Cotar (Ex-AfD, jetzt anti-sozialstaatliches Team Freiheit mit Frauke Petry (Ex-AfD) und Thomas Kemmerich (Ex-FDP)) Twitter gekauft. Nationalistischer, rassistischer Schund.

X-Beiträge, zunächst von Maximilian Krah, darunter von Elon Musk.

Maximilian Krah:
Kommentar zu einer Bundestagsrede von Johannes Schraps, SPD 
Dr. Maximilian Krah MdB @KrahMax vor 13 Std. "„Die zu Recht verbotene erste Strophe der Nationalhymne“ - was für ein Irrlicht von der SPD! Natürlich ist die 1. Strophe des Deutschlandliedes nicht verboten - warum auch? Es zeigt aber, wie diese Typen ticken: was Ihnen nicht passt, muss verboten sein!"

Drüberkommentar von Elon Musk zu einem Kommentar von The Rabbit Hole zum Vergleich von Grok und ChatGPT in der Einschätzung, ob Affirmative Action rassistisch ist. Der Kommentar von Rabbit Hole: "Grok correctly acknowledges Affirmative Action as being racist while ChatGPT does not." Der Kommentar zu diesem Kommentar von Elon Musk: Elon Musk @elonmusk vor 14 Std. "The only AI with truth as the fundamental goal is 
@Grok from @xAI"

Blog time! 📯 We feel that we understand things when certain patterns of explanations are in place. If reality doesn't follow those patterns, our understanding suffers. On to the third such eureka fallacy I've blogged about: explanation by optimization. petterhol.me/2025/12/10/t...

The eureka fallacy of optimization

When we learn things by studying or doing research, we perceive understanding as coming to us in step-like a-ha moments.1 I will argue that these moments happen more likely when we recognize (or ma…

petterhol.me

Here it is, the most damning academic figure in the history of all figures: Russian IRA accounts deeply embedded in both sides of the 2016 Twitter BLM "discussion" (by @katestarbird.bsky.social & team, 2018). THIS is what our information ecosystem supports. Twitter just made it 1% more visible.

Bild

I can understand that sentiment a lot. But I also know the other side, and I know how insanely frustrating and difficult to prevent such things can be. I’m not trying to sugarcoat the insane data breach, just acknowledge that they must’ve had a bad morning asking why they didn’t see it earlier.

Die Dimensionen in Wordembeddings könnten ja als Unterscheidungen im Luhmannschen Sinne interpretiert werden oder? Also man erlaube einem Text x viele Unterscheidungen aufzumachen... die häufig angestellte Projektion auf eine Achse wäre dann ja quasi das einnehmen eines Subsystems?Wo ist der Fehler

Here's your periodic reminder that much of what appears in mainstream econ journals has large overlaps with other social science fields. E.g., at least 6/15 papers in this top tier journal could probably be published in sociology journals too: academic.oup.com/qje/issue/?n...

Issues | The Quarterly Journal of Economics | Oxford Academic

The official journal of the President and Fellows of Harvard University. The oldest professional journal of economics in the English language, it covers all aspects of the field.

academic.oup.com