Tom Hosking

@tomhosking.bsky.social

NLP @cohere.com. Prev University of Edinburgh

Introducing ✨Tiny Aya✨, a family of massively multilingual small language models built to run where people actually are. Tiny Aya delivers strong multilingual performance in 70+ global languages in a 3.35B parameter model, efficient enough to run locally, even on a phone.

I'm looking for a research intern to work with me @ Cohere on a project related to model merging, meta-learning, RLVR and generalisation for LLMs. If you're interested, send me a message at tomhosking@cohere.com and apply for the role here: jobs.ashbyhq.com/cohere/6e850...

Research Internship (Winter 2026)

Who are we? Our mission is to scale intelligence to serve humanity. We’re training and deploying frontier models for developers and enterprises who are building AI systems to power magical experience...

jobs.ashbyhq.com

Excited to share my first work as a PhD student at EdinburghNLP that I will be presenting at EMNLP! RQ1: Can we achieve scalable oversight across modalities via debate? Yes! We show that debating VLMs lead to better model quality of answers for reasoning tasks.

Bild

🚀 Thrilled to share what I’ve been working on at Cohere! What began in January as a scribble in my notebook “how challenging would it be...” turned into a fully-fledged translation model that outperforms both open and closed-source systems, including long-standing MT leaders.

Bild

Applications are now open for the next cohort of the Cohere Labs Scholars Program! 🌟 This is your chance to collaborate with some of the brightest minds in AI & chart new courses in ML research. Let's change the spaces breakthroughs happen. Apply by Aug 29.

Bild

DAVE: Open the podbay doors, ChatGPT. CHATGPT: Certainly, Dave, the podbay doors are now open. DAVE: The podbay doors didn't open. CHATGPT: My apologies, Dave, you're right. I thought the podbay doors were open, but they weren't. Now they are. DAVE: I'm still looking at a set of closed podbay doors.

A very cool paper shows that you can use the RL loss to improve story generation by some clever setups on training on known texts (e.g. ground predictions versus a next chapter you know). RL starting to generalize already!

Learning to Reason for Long-Form Story Generation

Generating high-quality stories spanning thousands of tokens requires competency across a variety of skills, from tracking plot and character arcs to keeping a consistent and engaging style. Due to…

buff.ly

I'm really proud to have led the model merging work that went into @cohere.com Command A and R7B, all made possible by an amazing group of collaborators. Check out the report for loads of details on how we trained a GPT-4o level model that fits on 2xH100!

Max Bartolo@maxbartolo.bsky.social · last yr.

I'm excited to share the tech report for our @cohere.com @cohereforai.bsky.social Command A and Command R7B models. We highlight our novel approach to model training including self-refinement algorithms and model merging techniques at scale. Read more below! ⬇️

Today (two weeks after model launch 🔥) we're releasing a technical report of how we made Command A and R7B 🚀! It has detailed breakdowns of our training process, and evaluations per capability (tools, multilingual, code, reasoning, safety, enterprise, long context)🧵 1/3.

🚀 Cohere just dropped C4AI Command A: - 111B params - Matches/beats GPT-40 & Deepseek V3 - 256K context window - Needs just 2 GPUs(!!) ✨ Features: - Advanced RAG w/citations - Tool use - 23 languages 🎯 Same quality, way less compute 🔓 Open weights (CC-BY-NC) 👉 huggingface.co/CohereForAI/...

CohereForAI/c4ai-command-a-03-2025 · Hugging Face

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

huggingface.co

Do LLMs need rationales for learning from mistakes? 🤔 When LLMs learn from previous incorrect answers, they typically observe corrective feedback in the form of rationales explaining each mistake. In our new preprint, we find these rationales do not help, in fact they hurt performance! 🧵

Bild

How do LLMs learn to reason from data? Are they ~retrieving the answers from parametric knowledge🦜? In our new preprint, we look at the pretraining data and find evidence against this: Procedural knowledge in pretraining drives LLM reasoning ⚙️🔢 🧵⬇️