TotientQuotient

@totientquotient.bsky.social

Survived tripos, now doing a MMath at Waterloo. All effort, no skill. Still trying to become a mathematician. Probably suffering from the Algernon-Gordon effect x.com/t0tientqu0tient mathstodon.xyz/@TotientQuotient youtube.com/@totientquotient

The undergrad project I'm co-supervising this term just ended. Beyond being proud of what my mentees have achieved, witnessing the full process of how the ideas developed and watching their research skills grow in real-time is something I'll forever cherish. 1/2

Random blasphemous idea: every finite graph is chordal by the fundamental theorem of algebra if we allowed perfect elimination orderings to have complex-valued neighbor counts (whatever that means) and defined chordality through linear factorability of the chromatic polynomial.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chordal_graph#Maximal_cliques_and_graph_coloring

Funny how people complain that the new arXiv policy is too harsh. If anything, it's still way too lenient. Getting caught with AI slop should result in a permanent, publicly viewable (in the form of a hall of shame) ban and retroactive redaction of all previous arXiv submissions. #AcademicSky (1/4)

Good to see arXiv addressing type 2 errors by going after AI slop, but type 1 errors need addressing too. Lots of legitimate papers get rejected for no reason.

TThomas Dietterich@tdietterich.bsky.social · 3mo ago

We are implementing a similar policy at @arxiv.bsky.social. If there is incontrovertible evidence of LLM slop in a paper, this means the authors did not take the time to read the LLM output and we can't trust anything else in the paper. Penalty is 1 year ban from arXiv followed by...

Good to see arXiv addressing type 2 errors by going after AI slop, but type 1 errors need addressing too. Lots of legitimate papers get rejected for no reason.

TThomas Dietterich@tdietterich.bsky.social · 3mo ago

We are implementing a similar policy at @arxiv.bsky.social. If there is incontrovertible evidence of LLM slop in a paper, this means the authors did not take the time to read the LLM output and we can't trust anything else in the paper. Penalty is 1 year ban from arXiv followed by...

Honestly I feel like quitting this platform. The math community just isn't really big here and it Increasingly feels like I'm just talking to the void. I'm still active on tw*tter, and I might give mastodon another try too

For those who don't know me and what I've been through, I cannot overstate my gratitude towards Waterloo. While other grad schools refused to look past my grades, Waterloo showed sympathy towards my struggles with the Cambridge Tripos and offered me a chance to prove my worth.

Should I pay for Claude? I found the free version quite decent at doing literature reviews. Now that I'll be doing a lot more research soon, $20/month doesn't seem that bad of an investment if it's going to help a lot.