Trump Litigation Updates

@trumplitigation.lawfaremedia.org

Real time updates of @lawfaremedia.org's coverage of the Trump administration’s legal challenges

BREAKING: Justice Department agrees to withdraw subpoenas issued to New York Times reporters in leak investigation related to new Air Force One jet. Withdrawal of subpoenas follows hearing before NY federal judge, who indicated he was inclined to quash the subpoenas.

NEW: Today, Rep. Garcia and Sen. Blumenthal requested DHS Sec Mullin provide info and records related to two recent fatal ICE shootings, incidents which raise questions about whether ICE made promised reforms "and how ICE is using the massive funding that Congress appropriated"

BildBildBild

The @nytimes.com has filed a motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas to several of its reporters. The motion was actually filed 7/10 but is still sealed. NYT says it's trying to have it unsealed. Statement of David McCraw, Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel below:

Bild

Correction/clarification: NYT now says 5 g.j. subpoenas were prepared, but only 3 have been served. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/b...

Three Times reporters received subpoenas: Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton and Eric Schmitt. The newspaper learned that subpoenas were prepared for two others, Adam Goldman and Tyler Pager, but neither received one.
Roger Parloff@rparloff.bsky.social · 3w ago

The @nytimes.com has filed a motion to quash the grand jury subpoenas to several of its reporters. The motion was actually filed 7/10 but is still sealed. NYT says it's trying to have it unsealed. Statement of David McCraw, Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel below:

Attys for Reflecting Pool defendant David Hearn say govt witness told govt that photos Hearn took showing damaged liner (published in WaPo, e.g.) were taken *before* he touched the water—drawing into question how he could’ve damaged it. … 1/3

Bild

Today in federal court, Mahmoud Khalil sued the Heritage Foundation, Canary Mission, Betar, & senior Trump admin officials under the KKK Act of 1871, alleging they conspired to deprive him of his constitutional rights while carrying out a coordinated plan called "Project Esther."

Bild

Ruling in Trump v. IRS today, Judge Williams writes: "The nature of the suit [and] conduct of the Parties...make plain that this was an attempt to use the Court to provide some legitimacy to an agreement to confer immunity" to Trump affiliates and to earmark billions from U.S. taxpayers

Bild

E. Jean Carroll asks court to order Trump to pay the $5,779,783 he owes for Carroll II verdict for sex abuse & defamation ($5M plus interest). Trump’s atty wants time to weigh asking SCOTUS to “reconsider” its cert denial. She says fuhgeddaboudit. “This is the end of the line.” ... 1/3

Bild

Govt’s supplemental motion to dismiss J6 cases of 8 top Oath Keepers, 6 of whom were convicted of seditious conspiracy, is circular. Now that DC Circuit has vacated their convictions—at govt’s request—it’d be harassment to retry them, esp since Trump has already commuted sentences. ... 1/3

Bild

Trump's emergency plea to the DC Circuit to stop removal of his name from the Kennedy Center included this odd reference to a bylaw that had never been mentioned before in the litigation. It's looking increasingly like it was passed last week—and maybe on Thursday, the day before the petition.

Roger Parloff@rparloff.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Here Trump asserts that center’s “trustees” passed a poison-pill bylaw that requires return of donations if his name is ever removed. AFAIK this has never been alleged before in the litigation. If true, is another shocking indictment of his board of toadies. 2/5

Without the name, "Trump" on the Building, our fundraising will not
only come to a halt, but any and all monies raised or committed would be
obligated to be returned, retunded, or terminated. The Bylaws of The Trump
Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts Foundation state, unequivocally: "The
Corporation may make donations to the Center in support of its educational,
artistic, cultural, and performing arts functions; provided, however, that in so
doing, the Board of Directors shall condition such donations to the Center upon
the name of the Center remaining unchanged as the 'Donald J. Trump and John
F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.' In the event the Center
should at any time remove the name of President Donald J. Trump from its
filings, marketing, branding, façade, or any other affiliated location, the
Corporation shall recover from the Center the total of all gifts, donations, and
contributions made to the Center by or on behalf of the Corporation." The
reason for this clause is that people and companies, who have given, or will be
giving, millions of dollars to the Center were only willing to do so with the name
"Trump" on the Building.

BREAKING: Judge Brinkema in E.D.Va. grants preliminary injunction against Trump’s slush fund, holding that case is not moot, that at least one plaintiff has standing and is likely to succeed on the merits. Gives govt one week to get sworn declaration from Blanche/Bessent that fund is truly dead.

Some protestor outside Alexandria courthouse with sign NO TERRORIST SLUSH FUND

Judge Cooper DENIES Trump's motion to stay removal of his name from the Kennedy Center. "... [I]ssuance of a stay pending appeal would not be in the public interest, which is rarely served by the 'perpetuation' of 'unlawful' governmental action."

MINUTE ORDER: Defendants' 55 L Motion for a Stay of Permanent Injunction Pending Appeal is hereby DENIED.
"A stay pending appeal is an extraordinary remedy" and may only be granted if the traditional stay factors are satisfied.
KalshiEX LLC v. CFTC, 119 F.4th 58, 63 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (cleaned up). Defendants have not carried their burden to establish that a stay of the Court's May 29, 2026 permanent injunction concerning the Kennedy Center's renaming is warranted pending an appeal of the underlying ruling to the D.C. Circuit. Most notably, for the detailed reasons laid out in the Court's ruling, Defendants have not "made a strong showing that [they] are likely to succeed on the merits" of any appeal. Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 426 (2009) (quoting Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987)). Nor have Defendants demonstrated that they "will be irreparably injured absent a stay," id. (quoting Hilton, 481 U.S. at
776), given both the de minimis resources that would be required to restore the Center's current name in the event of a successful appeal and the lack of record evidence linking increased donations to the current name. Further, Defendants have apparently taken substantial steps toward complying with the Court's May 29 permanent injunction order on renaming. See Mot. for Misc. Relief, ECF No. 51, Ex. A (June 4, 2026 memorandum from the Kennedy Center's Office of General Counsel directing staff to comply with the Court's permanent injunction on renaming). These efforts undermine the notion that Defendants face irreparable harm in complying with the order in full. The failure to demonstrate irreparable harm is "fatal" to a movant's stay request, KalshiEx, 119 F.4th at 64, as is the failure to show a likelihood of success on the merits. What's more, issuance of a stay pending appeal would not be in the public interest, which is rarely served by the "perpetuation" of "unlawful" governmental action. League of Women Voters of the U.S. v.
Newby, 838 F.3d 1, 12 (D…

Full text of the Senate version of Blumenthal/Frost's bicameral Right to Record Act which would add new legal consequences for federal/immigration enforcement officers who prevent recording, observing, or peacefully protesting law enforcement activities (which is already constitutionally protected)

BildBildBildBild