Rochelle

@uberwensch.bsky.social

like if Just Some Guy was a girl pfp: @nokomento.bsky.social

I wanted to think of a galilei-covariant classical field equation, to understand quantization of fields without some relativistic issues coming in. But I don't think there are any ovservable, galilei-covariant, classical fields!

I was wondering, for say the EM or the Dirac field, why not just quantize the algebra of gauge-invariant quantities directly. Ofc, if you do that, then you can't couple them together properly... Its like the two systems have more DoF together than they had separately

i think i understand physics pretty well. im just a little iffy on QFT, actually NRQM too, and thermodynamics, stat mech, SR, GR, even classical mech and im not quite sure i get locality, symmetry, gauge, mass, space, time, force, inertia, motion, heat, work, entropy, temperature, particles, fields,

The Swiss Cheese solution to Theodicy: None of that stuff happened. Spacetime is full of holes, like swiss cheese. The only things that actually happen are the memories of bad stuff having happened. Every bad thing is absent from reality.

My landlord is out on the corner, with a tin can. I move to drop a few rent payments into it. "Don't bother," urges my friend, "he's just going to spend it on boats."

Hold on. This basic problem here, that spacetime points have no identity across models or counterfactuals, infects the idea of gravitational waves... doesn't it? Is there a unique way of constructing the flat spacetime against which 'waving' is measured? Is it coordinate-dependent? Does it matter?

Gregor@coexact.bsky.social · 4mo ago

the paper by Geroch which he cites has the same limit λ→0 but doesn't call it 'shrinking the mass' which just seems confused? though I agree that counterfactuals like this are difficult in GR, but am not sure whether more so than in other gauge theories