Dr Urmila Chadayammuri

@uchadaya.bsky.social

Astronomy & Astrophysics Editor at Nature, very invested in better life on Earth. Views my own.

Your Prime Day reminder that half of Amazon warehouse workers struggle with food & housing costs. A third have had to rely on government assistance like SNAP — which was gutted last year. If Bezos can spend $500M on a yacht, Amazon can afford to treat its workers with dignity.

More than once I have heard techies in the EU lament that we are going to "lose the AI race". When I ask how that's measured, they say "Isn't it obvious?" No, it's not. Forcing the tech dev to slow down to consider the human and societal implications is a win. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Is AI ruining our skills? Early results are in — and they’re not good

Reliance on artificial-intelligence tools degrades the abilities of physicians and software engineers, studies show.

nature.com

This vlogger quit his PhD to dedicate himself to science communication. Since then, he has unveiled data fabrication in several high-profile papers, and discusses how these are only to be expected in a publish-or-perish culture.

‘Student Geng’ ignites research-integrity scandal in China after calling out senior academics

Video blogger’s viral accusations of data manipulation in Nature journals have sparked intense debate and speedy institutional investigations.

nature.com

“We used to think language was this diffuse, whole-network phenomenon,” says Ziv Williams, a neurosurgeon [...] and co-author of the study. “But it turns out you have specific neurons that only care if a word is a noun, or only care if a phrase is ending.”

Magdalena Skipper@magdalenaskipper.bsky.social · 2mo ago

What happens in the frontotemporal cortex during language production? Turns out distinct neurons represent detailed grammatical relationships between words & others track the sentences’ higher-order syntactic structure, phrase transitions & sequence @nature.com 🧪 www.nature.com/articles/s41...

I am not excited about Artemis. I remember the day the mission got approved overnight because of Trump‘s jingoisms, while we astronomers were wrapping up decades of work proposing scientifically useful missions for the NASA 2020 Decadal Survey. 1/n

Reminder: you don't have to publish Gold Open Access if your paper is accepted at Nature or a Nature Research Journal. AND we allow you to self-archive your work, e.g. on the ArXiv. The pre-review version can go up any time, and the post-review version can go up 6 months after publication date.

If you, like countless others, wonder why GDP numbers look great while your economic experience goes to sh*t, there's a wealth of research explaining why. GDP is simply not a good/complete measure of economic health. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

End GDP mania: how the world should really measure prosperity

The obsession with economic output as a measure of human development puts sustainability on the back burner. Researchers can now help to devise better indicators.

nature.com

There are lots of great papers out there on the limitations of claiming the existence of "life" from the detection of certain molecules; here is just one. The astrobiology community itself has plenty of nuanced discussions on the defining life beyond Earth. liebertpub.com/doi/full/10....

Is There Such a Thing as a Biosignature? | Astrobiology

The concept of a biosignature is widely used in astrobiology to suggest a link between some observation and a biological cause, given some context. The term itself has been defined and used in several ways in different parts of the scientific community involved in the search for past or present life on Earth and beyond. With the ongoing acceleration in the search for life in distant time and/or deep space, there is a need for clarity and accuracy in the formulation and reporting of claims. Here, we critically review the biosignature concept(s) and the associated nomenclature in light of several problems and ambiguities emphasized by recent works. One worry is that these terms and concepts may imply greater certainty than is usually justified by a rational interpretation of the data. A related worry is that terms such as “biosignature” may be inherently misleading, for example, because the divide between life and non-life—and their observable effects—is fuzzy. Another worry is that different parts of the multidisciplinary community may use non-equivalent or conflicting definitions and conceptions, leading to avoidable confusion. This review leads us to identify a number of pitfalls and to suggest how they can be circumvented. In general, we conclude that astrobiologists should exercise particular caution in deciding whether and how to use the concept of biosignature when thinking and communicating about habitability or life. Concepts and terms should be selected carefully and defined explicitly where appropriate. This would improve clarity and accuracy in the formulation of claims and subsequent technical and public communication about some of the most profound and important questions in science and society. With this objective in mind, we provide a checklist of questions that scientists and other interested parties should ask when assessing any reported detection of a “biosignature” to better understand exactly what is being claimed.

liebertpub.com

It took an extension to the extension of the extension, but after more than 3 years of negotiations, governments around the globe—but notably, not the United States—have finally agreed on a treaty to improve how the world prevents, prepares for, and responds to future pandemics. scim.ag/4lDYcLe

Global pandemic treaty finalized, without U.S., in ‘a victory for multilateralism’

Three years in the making, the accord aims to increase equity and avoid errors of the COVID-19 pandemic

scim.ag

Editorial: The skies are a shared resource. We spend public money and push the limits of technology to look into the depths of the Universe - but now often see private communication satellites instead. Solutions exist, but regulation and enforcement are lacking. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Cleaning up space: how satellites and telescopes can live together

Satellites connect people around the world but they also interfere with astronomers’ views of the cosmos. There are ways to reduce these tensions.

nature.com

Space debris is not an abstract or distant problem - it crash-lands in or right next to human settlements around the world. And with tens of thousands of launches every year, this is not getting any better unless we fundamentally change both design and regulation. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Space debris is falling from the skies. We need to tackle this growing danger

Why failing to control defunct satellites leaves everyone at risk from their impacts.

nature.com