Veracity

@verac-ity.bsky.social

Website: https://veracityai.app/ AI workspace that makes journalism faster and safer.

๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜! The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism has launched its three-day ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—”๐—œ, ๐—๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜†. Apply through the link in the comments section. @reutersinstitute.bsky.social @ox.ac.uk

Reuters Institute Masterclass in AI, Journalism & Society.

Newsrooms in 2026 are running leaner than ever! The BBC. Vox. The Washington Post. CBS. The same week the cuts were announced, the deadlines didn't change. The standards didn't change. The byline still carries the same weight it always did. (1/5) โฌ

The one question the journalism industry hasnโ€™t answered yet.. AI changed how journalism gets written. It didnโ€™t change who gets blamed. If AI writes the first draft, ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ž๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ซ? (1/4)๐Ÿ‘‡

Every article was reviewed by a human editor. ๐’๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ, ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ง ๐ก๐š๐ฅ๐Ÿ ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ ! In a recent case: AI said a $10k deposit at 3% would earn $10,300. The real earnings? $300. It looked right, though.. Thatโ€™s the problem. (1/3) ๐Ÿ‘‡

The difference between good and great journalism? Verifying whatโ€™s on record. ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ. Thatโ€™s always been the standard. (continued ๐Ÿ‘‡)(1/7)

Good Journalism vs Great Journalism - Veracity

One of the main reasons why Anthropic has surpassed OpenAI in valuation and ARR is not just because it has targeted corporate clients aggressively.. It is also because it invests heavily in R&D and has a solid team behind it. Thatโ€™s been a core focus for us at Veracity. (continue๐Ÿ‘‡)

One phrase. No source. Thousands of shares. This is how misinformation travels โ€” not as an obvious lie, but as something that sounds right. Historically grounded enough to repeat without checking.

BildBildBildBild

I came across this insight and it reframes the whole sourcing conversation: sources almost never want to be the only named person in a story. They want to be part of a chorus. The moment you can say "three others are already on the record," the math changes. open.substack.com/pub/offrecor...

How to Get a Reluctant Source On the Record

The specific moves that turn โ€œbackground onlyโ€ into โ€œyou can use my nameโ€โ€”and why most reporters never even try

open.substack.com